Why did SC take suo moto notice of Faisal Vawda’s presser??
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00 A big development has happened.
00:02 A letter has been written by the judges of the Islamabad High Court.
00:05 In return for that letter, you know, when the whole matter was going on,
00:10 Faisal Wada Sahib came to our program yesterday.
00:12 He had written a letter, "Mr. Minoo, tell me, how did Babar Sattar become a judge?
00:21 Why didn't he tell us that if this is a dual Sharia, then it was for his children, was it necessary or not?"
00:26 He had written a letter. He also held a press conference the other day.
00:30 Now, the Supreme Court has taken a sumoto notice on that.
00:33 We will know from Raja Mohsin, but before that, let me tell you this.
00:37 Article 63(c) of the constitution is very clear that for a member of the National Assembly,
00:45 it is necessary that he is not a dual national.
00:49 Or he has not taken the Sharia of any country where you have to leave the Sharia of your country.
00:55 So, it is necessary for him to be a citizen of Pakistan and not to take the passport or Sharia of any other country.
01:01 Along with this, the conditions of the High Court judges' appointment are very clear.
01:09 They should have an experience of 10 years of High Court practice.
01:16 And the rest, their qualification, professional, should have a blameless career.
01:21 All that happened. Now, when Wada Sahab asked this question and gave an answer to it,
01:27 in response, the Islamabad High Court in writing said that, "This matter was discussed in the Supreme Judicial Council."
01:35 And the Chief Justice of Islamabad at that time, Atar Malala, said that this, this, this, he has already said.
01:42 And the Islamabad High Court also said that there is no restriction on dual national,
01:47 Pakistan's, to be a member of the Judiciary.
01:51 And today also we saw many press conferences.
01:53 This Faisal Wada Sahab's press conference, there was a notice of 100 votes.
01:56 What is the basic reason? What is the news in it?
02:00 But today you see that this Naib Tarameem case in which Bani Chairman was presented,
02:03 during its hearing, Justice Atar Malala Sahab, without taking name from this reference,
02:08 but the content, that is, his indication was towards Faisal Wada Sahab's press conference.
02:12 We are being told that we will make turbans football.
02:17 Such people are actually exposing themselves.
02:20 Justice Atar Malala Sahab, are you threatening us through your proxies?
02:27 Atar Malala Sahab's answer, Attorney General Sahab said that this is happening,
02:31 it should not be like this.
02:33 Now see, Attorney General Sahab's answer,
02:35 he has summed up the whole matter,
02:38 Attorney General Sahab's answer, you have read it,
02:40 he is saying that this is not happening.
02:43 On one hand, Faisal Wada Sahab's press conference was held yesterday,
02:46 and Attorney General Sahab is saying in the court that this is not happening.
02:49 A judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan is saying one thing,
02:51 Attorney General Sahab is saying that this is not happening.
02:53 High Court judges are writing letters and saying that they have started the court proceedings.
02:57 In the notice, has it been explained that this has been taken for this reason?
03:01 See, till now it is that this has been taken for the press conference,
03:04 after that all the content will be brought to the camera,
03:07 and then it will be seen and then you will hear the whole thing.
03:10 But what wrong has Faisal Wada Sahab said?
03:12 He has asked questions, he has asked questions, what else has he done?
03:15 If you ask questions, you will understand.
03:18 See, the matter is very simple,
03:20 he wrote a letter to the judges,
03:23 he asked questions, what clarification has he done?
03:27 Hassan, you please talk.
03:29 There is a method in relation to the judges.
03:32 Chaudhary Sahab, this is a matter that has been going on since yesterday,
03:35 that it should be done, because there was a press conference on this with Tatar,
03:38 that what has happened?
03:40 But I have only one opinion, I have also written on it,
03:42 that God forbid, make a law that a person with a dual Shariah,
03:47 a lawyer, cannot become a judge of Pakistan, then the matter will end.
03:51 Yes, Chaudhary Sahab.
03:53 There was no restriction till now.
03:55 There was no restriction till now, not at all.
03:57 And that dual Shariah does not exist.
03:59 I am saying it today and I am saying it now,
04:01 that first of all, you should not attack the court as a institution.
04:08 This is not a channel and this is not our policy.
04:13 Number two, if you have a press conference against judges,
04:20 then their respect will be malignant.
04:22 So, today, they have taken a so-called motto,
04:25 that Pakistan has not done this on the insistence of judges,
04:29 that is, without any justification.
04:32 So, now the people who were taking out the cars and attacking the judges,
04:37 they will have to prove and answer for the allegations they have made.
04:49 So, tomorrow, the hearing of the Sumodu case will take place.
04:55 What is the time?
04:56 It is 2.30 am.
04:58 But, viewers, this is an airway channel, this is our program,
05:01 the policy editorial of our channel has always been that
05:04 the respect for judges and the respect for the judiciary is necessary.
05:07 If someone has a lot of pain,
05:11 under Article 209, the Supreme Judicial Council is present,
05:14 if you request, then you have to complain against any judge.
05:17 the video.