Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 5/12/2024
During a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Tuesday, Rep. Russell Fry (R-SC) spoke about Chinese counterfeit goods flooding the US market.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00 Mack, gentleman from South Carolina is recognized.
00:05 Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for having this hearing today.
00:08 For generations, the textile industry has been a pillar of the economy in both South Carolina
00:13 and the United States. Darling Fibers, in the district I represent, is one of the largest
00:18 domestic producers of high-quality fibers for fabric, garment, and fashion industries. Milliken,
00:24 also in South Carolina, is located in Spartanburg and has been in the business since the 1800s.
00:30 I've heard from many of my constituents concerning their concerns regarding De Minimis. So most of my
00:36 questions are going to be centered around that. De Minimis imports from places like China count
00:41 for, have exceeded a billion total packages just last year, according to the CBP reports.
00:47 E-commerce giants are flooding the U.S. market with low-cost products. Many of them, as we know
00:53 from the hearing today, are counterfeit, and yet they avoid inspection and taxes. Unfortunately,
00:59 this number, I think, is expected to grow in the coming years.
01:03 Deputy Director Lord, you oversee CBP policy and enforcement priorities,
01:07 and I've heard from many constituent companies about the problems they are facing due to the
01:13 influx of De Minimis packages entering the U.S. We've heard that 85 percent of all IP seizures
01:19 occur in the De Minimis environment, and it's become a highway for other illicit goods,
01:24 such as fentanyl, which has been talked about here. The sheer volume of these duty-free packages,
01:30 though, is crippling our own economy and our own companies and our own American workers,
01:34 especially in textiles, which is a crucial industry not only for my district, but my state,
01:41 and indeed the country. So, Mr. Lord, how do we close these loopholes?
01:48 What policy recommendations would be helpful to you in closing these loopholes?
01:53 Well, thank you very much for the question, Congressman. I want to acknowledge first that
02:00 Customs and Border Protection is very much aware of the challenges that the textile industry is
02:04 facing in this moment. We've been working closely with the domestic textile producers in the United
02:10 States since, we'll say, September or October of last year. I've had the privilege of going down
02:17 to some of the production facilities in South Carolina that you've mentioned during my career.
02:21 It's an impressive operation, and I don't wake up every day, and my staff does not wake up every day
02:26 not thinking about how to protect U.S. jobs. When it comes to the specific challenges in De Minimis,
02:32 we are ramping up our inspections of textile products in the De Minimis environment.
02:37 As an agency, we've made investments at some of our laboratory and scientific services centers
02:43 around the country in Savannah, New York, and Los Angeles. They will have very cutting-edge
02:48 technology to begin testing textiles for compliance with the Uyghur Forced Labor
02:53 Protection Act. We do intend and are deploying that technology in the De Minimis environment.
03:00 There's a perception that we're not testing for that in the De Minimis environment. That is not
03:05 true. Mr. Lord, let me ask you something real quick, and I don't mean to cut you off, but I've
03:08 got two minutes. I just want to kind of vet this thing through a little bit. Do you think that
03:12 maybe labeling China as a country of concern would be a prudent step for us to take in Congress?
03:21 Because we know that most of these issues are coming from the PRC, at least they're a big actor
03:25 in this, but would that be helpful to you in your efforts to do your job? That is an excellent
03:34 question, sir. It's difficult for me to answer without understanding what that label might
03:39 trigger in terms of additional legal authorities or presumption of guilt or anything along those
03:44 lines. At Customs, we're focused on the China threat, sir. More than happy to explore those
03:50 ideas with you and your staff. We're committed to finding workable solutions in the De Minimis
03:56 space. Mr. Lord, as part of your portfolio, you oversee the De Minimis Data Pilot Program.
04:01 What insights can you provide about the results so far?
04:06 Absolutely. I appreciate you asking that question, sir. Our two pilot programs in the De Minimis
04:11 environment have been running since the summer of 2019. Those two pilot programs look at a couple
04:19 different things, but what I'll just highlight is what we're discovering is there is better
04:22 data out there that will help us better segment risk and identify compliant or non-compliant
04:27 shipments, particularly from what I'll call non-traditional actors in the supply chain
04:32 to include online marketplaces. We have successfully been able to pair a web address of a
04:39 product listing with a small package coming through. That data from that website helps us make
04:45 better risk management decisions. Last fiscal year, when there was a billion small packages
04:52 entering the United States, over half of them had additional information from one of those two tests,
04:56 which to us signals an interest in the private sector in getting this additional data for us.
05:01 And as a result, we're in the process now of updating our regulations
05:04 to codify the lessons learned from those tests.
05:08 Thank you for that. And I'll just conclude by saying, look, there are so many concerns. You
05:13 know, I didn't know a lot about IP when I got onto this subcommittee, but there are so many
05:17 concerns from the fees and tariffs that the United States is missing out on within the De Minimis
05:25 space. There's no adherence by foreign actors or entities on the Uyghur Act that you mentioned,
05:33 labor standards. The IP concerns are very self-evident when you look at kind of what
05:38 we're talking about here. And of course, at the end of the day, the real impact, and this isn't
05:43 a fault at you, I'm just kind of sharing the concern that I have, which I think you share too,
05:47 is that American workers and American companies are put at a disadvantage because we basically
05:52 have created a free trade agreement with China because of this, because they're shipping these
05:57 things in with substandard labor standards. And American companies are forced to compete with that
06:04 on an international stage at a very big disadvantage to them. And so however we can
06:10 partner with you, I'm happy to do that and listen to your insights, because I think this is a very
06:15 big issue for our country to tackle. Thank you so much.
06:18 Chairman, if I may.
06:20 Mr. Lorden.
06:22 Thank you, sir. Thank you for that, Congressman. I would just like to say and offer my staff to
06:27 reach out to your staff. We have an initiative that I mentioned in my opening remarks, the 21st
06:31 Century Customs Framework Initiative, that proposes statutory changes to help us better manage this
06:38 environment. We are concerned, just to be very direct, and we do need help and are eager to
06:43 partner with Congress. So thank you. Well, and thank you, by the way, for being, and all three
06:48 of you, quite frankly, but thank you for being a witness that actually answers questions. We have
06:53 that very rarely in Congress sometimes. So thank you for that. Mr. Chairman, I yield back.
06:57 The gentleman yields back. I'm going to...

Recommended