Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • yesterday
During a Senate Finance Committee hearing on Thursday, Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-NH) spoke about president Trump's decision to pardon people convicted of with crimes related to the January 6 Capitol Insurrection.
Transcript
00:00Mr. Chairman.
00:02Thank you, Senator Lankford.
00:03Senator Hassan.
00:04Oh, thanks, Mr. Chairman, and to you and the ranking member for this hearing.
00:08Good morning to our nominees, and congratulations on your nominations to you and your families,
00:13because I know this is a full family effort.
00:17I'm going to start with a question, and with respect to my colleague from Oklahoma, I want
00:22to be very clear.
00:23I ask all nominees this question.
00:25And if directed by the president to take an action that would break the law, would you
00:29follow the law or follow the president's directive?
00:32And I'm not talking about regulatory interpretation that courts decide.
00:36That's part of our democracy.
00:37I'm talking about a president whose OMB director sat in front of me in a committee hearing and
00:42said he did not believe that he or the president had to follow the Impoundment Control Act of
00:461974, even though the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that it is constitutional.
00:51So, right down the line, if you're directed to take an action by the president that would
00:57break the law, are you going to follow the law or the president's directive, Mr. Spitzer?
01:01I will follow the law.
01:02Mr. Sherrall.
01:03I don't think I'd be asked to do that, but I'm an attorney.
01:05I follow the law.
01:07I was in Trump 45, honored to serve in that role.
01:09I was never asked to violate the law, and I believe if President Trump were here right
01:13now, he'd say, Mike Stewart, follow the law.
01:15Well, good, because he pardoned a bunch of people who attacked police officers and were convicted
01:20by a jury of ordinary Americans.
01:22Mr. Thurr.
01:22Senator Hassan, I don't expect I would ever be asked that, but irrespective of the actions
01:27of others, I will follow the law.
01:29Mr. Stewart, we share a commitment to ending the scourge of the fentanyl epidemic.
01:35I represent New Hampshire, and as you know, our 1.4 million people have been devastated by
01:40the fentanyl epidemic, just as the people of West Virginia have.
01:43Addiction medicine doctors across the country agree that methadone is one of the most effective
01:49medications to treat people with opioid use disorder.
01:52In his testimony before Congress, Secretary Kennedy said that medication-assisted treatment
01:57is a critical tool for preventing overdose deaths.
02:01This is one area where Secretary Kennedy and I agree.
02:04As a state senator, you introduced a bill that would have outlawed methadone clinics in your
02:09state, which would have effectively ended the use of methadone to treat opioid addiction
02:14in West Virginia.
02:15I understand that there are bad actors in the methadone clinic space, to be sure, but do
02:20you think Secretary Kennedy is wrong to support medication-assisted treatment like methadone?
02:25So I thank you for the question very much, and it's such an important question, and it rides
02:30inside my soul and in the times of the essence.
02:32But I support and agree with Secretary Kennedy full-heartedly on the issue of medically-assisted
02:39treatment.
02:40That story that you're talking about in terms of methadone, the issues of methadone, suboxone,
02:47other treatment methodologies with respect to the opiate scourge or people who suffer with
02:52substance abuse disorder, one of the most important things they get is they need wraparound services
02:57with that.
02:58Yeah, no, I understand that.
02:59I'm just trying to get at, so you'll support efforts at the department to expand access to
03:04all types of medication-assisted treatment, including both methadone and buprenorphine?
03:08I'm going to support Secretary Kennedy on this issue.
03:10I agree with him on it, but keep in mind there's a difference between being a policymaker in West
03:15Virginia.
03:15No, I just want to understand that you agree that the gold standard here is medication-assisted
03:21treatment for fentanyl addiction.
03:23In particular, buprenorphine's important.
03:25Doctors can now prescribe it in their offices.
03:28It's really important.
03:29I agree that wraparound services are also important.
03:32I just wanted to make sure that we're clear on that.
03:34Let me move forward to Mr. Shirello.
03:37If confirmed, you'd oversee the distribution of grant funding that Congress appropriates to
03:43the department.
03:44Congress appropriated $286 million for the Title X Family Planning Program this year.
03:49This funding supports preventive care visits for nearly 3 million Americans each year.
03:55As part of this care, the Title X funds cervical cancer screenings, which detect possible signs
04:01of cancer in tens of thousands of women every year.
04:04If confirmed, will you commit to distribute every dollar that Congress appropriates for the
04:09life-saving Title X program in accordance with the law?
04:12Thank you for the question, Senator Hassan, and I appreciated the opportunity to meet with
04:18you and talk about this issue before.
04:21The Title X issues that you're talking about, and the particular cancer screening, are issues
04:25that have hit my family, and we can't emphasize the importance of getting tested and being evaluated
04:32on those things.
04:33As I told you at the beginning here, I will follow the law when it comes to appropriations
04:37and managing, and I will lean heavily on my operating divisions to guide as to what the
04:43mission-critical funding is necessary.
04:45All right.
04:45Well, I appreciate that.
04:46Right now, the administration is withholding half a million dollars in Title X money from
04:50my state, even though it has been appropriated, and it is supposed to be used for these cancer
04:54screenings.
04:55So I hope we can get to work to getting that money out.
04:57Finally, Mr. Switzer, we need to work on a bipartisan basis to counter China's unfair and
05:03abusive trade practices.
05:04Unfortunately, the president seems to back down every time there is a chance to hold the
05:09Chinese government accountable, like just this week extending the tariff pause on China
05:13without any clear wins for the United States.
05:16Meanwhile, the administration has targeted our allies, like Canada, with tariffs that raise
05:21costs for families in New Hampshire and damage our economic partnerships.
05:25As Deputy U.S. Trade Representative covering Asia, would you advise administration officials
05:30to reverse tariffs that target our allies, like Canada, in order to focus on actually
05:35combating unfair trade from adversaries like the Chinese government?
05:40Thank you, Senator, for that question.
05:42What I will say specifically, I'm not in right now, so the specifics of Canada are very difficult
05:47for me to speak about.
05:48But what I can say is that the totality of the trade policy of the president is to address
05:55a global problem.
05:57We have a global national security problem that is where China is at the center in many
06:03cases, but it's not solely about China.
06:05And so what I would say is that I would recommend that we continue to focus on China with the
06:12recognition that China is the second largest economy in the world.
06:15Well, and let me stop you, because I'm over and I appreciate the chair's indulgence here.
06:19I just got back from a bipartisan trip to Canada.
06:22Our best friends to our north, my state's biggest trading partner, are having to look
06:27elsewhere for the kind of partnerships that are going to undermine our relationship and,
06:32frankly, our joint security interests with Canada, who is a highly cooperative and constructive
06:39partner with northern border security as well as other issues.
06:43We are making a grave mistake in the way we are treating Canada, and it is going to haunt
06:48us for years if we do not change quickly.
06:50Thank you, Mr. Chair.
06:51Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Recommended