Saltar al reproductorSaltar al contenido principalSaltar al pie de página
  • anteayer
Descubre cómo Corea del Sur enfrentó el reciente anuncio de la ley marcial por parte del presidente Yoon Suk Yeol. Analizamos el impacto histórico, político y social de esta medida, su conexión con la dictadura militar del pasado y cómo el pueblo surcoreano y sus instituciones respondieron para proteger la democracia. Una mirada profunda a los desafíos y lecciones para las democracias del mundo.

Si te gustó el contenido puedes suscribirte al canal, comentar y darle me gusta.

Puedes ayudar al canal con aportación económica por:

Paypal - https://paypal.me/rdarium

Puedes visitarme en diferentes sitios de Internet:

En YouTube - https://youtube.com/@rdarium
Sitio Web - https://sites.google.com/view/rdarium
En Instagram - https://instagram.com/rda1m
En TikTok - https://tiktok.com/@rdarium
En X - https://x.com/RdA1m
En Odysee - https://odysee.com/@RdAVideos:e
En DailyMotion - https://dailymotion.com/rdarium
En Pressdek - https://pressdek.com/@rdarium
En Twitch - https://www.twitch.tv/rdariumlive
En Rumble - https://rumble.com/rdarium
En Facebook - https://facebook.com/reflexionesdahora
Facebook Page - https://facebook.com/RdAriumpage

Gracias por tu atención y colaboración

⛔️Queda prohibido reproducir, copiar, distribuir, publicar, transmitir, difundir, o en cualquier modo explotar cualquier fragmento de este video sin la autorización previa por escrito del canal RdArium. El cual tiene la exclusiva para la explotación comercial del contenido de este video.

©️ RdArium - Todos los Derechos Reservados

#CoreaDelSur #LeyMarcial #HistoriaDeCorea #Democracia #PolíticaInternacional #CrisisPolítica #Geopolítica #DerechosHumanos #CoreaDelNorte #noticias

Categoría

🗞
Noticias
Transcripción
00:00Martial law is a term that conjures up disturbing images of military dictatorships and restrictions.
00:19extreme. This state of extension gives the military total control, suspending
00:27fundamental rights such as freedom of expression, assembly and press. Although its purpose
00:34official may be to restore order in crisis situations, history has shown us that,
00:41On too many occasions, it has been used as a tool of oppression and authoritarian control.
00:48In South Korea, the memory of martial law is deeply intertwined with the regime.
00:54military that dominated the country for decades. Particularly traumatic was the episode
01:01of the Wanyu massacre in 1980, when martial law was used to brutally suppress
01:09a pro-democracy protest, leaving wounds that have not yet fully healed in
01:15the collective memory of South Koreans. Today, South Korea has revived those
01:22dark dry lands of the past. In an unexpected, televised announcement, President Jun Suk Jeol declared
01:30Martial law. Its justification was to respond to alleged anti-state activities linked
01:38to the political opposition and North Korea. However, this drastic measure did not take into account
01:45with the support of the National Assembly or the South Korean people. Within hours,
01:52Parliament repealed martial law with a unanimous vote, something virtually unheard of in
01:59modern politics. Even the president's allies joined in this rejection, leaving
02:06Of course, the country's democratic institutions are prepared to resist any
02:12attempt at authoritarian backsliding. Jun's statement not only sparked a political crisis,
02:20but also a wave of demonstrations in the streets. Citizens, aware of
02:26the importance of protecting their democracy, they marched with banners and slogans such as
02:33We will never return to the past. This popular outcry made it clear that the wounds of the past are
02:40still fresh and the South Korean people will not allow it to be repeated. International organizations
02:48as Amnesty International quickly pointed out the risks of using martial law to
02:55silencing dissenting voices, warning of the dangerous precedent this could set.
03:03South Korea, as one of the most developed democracies in Asia, remains an example
03:09of civic resistance and institutional responsibility. President Jun defended his decision by claiming
03:18the existence of a North Korean-backed conspiracy. However, the lack of evidence
03:25raised suspicions that this move was an attempt to divert attention from scandals
03:32corruption involving his close circle. Currently, Jun faces a growing
03:40political pressure. The opposition has initiated proceedings for an impeachment, a process
03:48which could result in his dismissal if he achieves the support of two-thirds of Parliament
03:53and the approval of the Constitutional Court. This puts Jun's administration in a
04:00extremely precarious position. This episode is a stark reminder that surveillance
04:08Citizen and legislative action are essential to prevent authoritarian backsliding. South Korea
04:15The South has shown that even in the most critical moments, democratic values
04:21can prevail if institutions and the people work together. For democracies
04:28For all the world, this case serves as a warning. Freedoms won should never be taken for granted.
04:35sit-ins. History teaches us that the best defense against authoritarianism is an informed people,
04:42united and willing to strike in defense of their rights. While the political future of
04:50South Korea remains uncertain. One thing is clear, its people and its institutions have given
04:57an unequivocal message. Democracy is not just a system of government, it is a commitment
05:04collective that must be defended, even in the face of the greatest threats.

Recomendada