Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • yesterday
During a House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing on Tuesday, Rep. John Joyce (R-PA) asked Network for Hope CEO, Barry Massa about alleged retaliation against a whistleblower.
Transcript
00:00I want to thank all the witnesses for your testimony. We will now move to
00:04questioning. I will begin and recognize myself for five minutes. Mr. Massa, when
00:10looking at how your OPO handled the index case from the HRSA report, very
00:16simply, yes or no, do you still maintain the assertion from your testimony that
00:21all of the relevant OPTN policy, regulations, statute, and rule were
00:27followed by CODA and the handling of the DCD case?
00:32My apologies. Thank you, Chairman Joyce, for your question. That case was very
00:40complex and during a very complex time. If you recall in 2021, we were in the midst
00:46of COVID and I think that impacted the communication that we had within our
00:52between our hospital and our team. And while I'm not using that as an excuse, I
00:58do think it added to the complexity of it. With that said, we know that a
01:05successful donation experience happens when there is frequent communication. And I
01:13think in that case, in this case that we're talking about, the communication
01:18could have been vastly improved. And if that communication wasn't where it should
01:23have been, can you say yes or no? Was policy, regulation, statute, and rule, was that
01:29followed? The DCD process was followed. Yes, sir. But again, I think in light of the
01:36horrific pain and suffering that the index patient endured, do you agree then if it
01:43was followed? And what we have read about this case, do you think that stricter
01:48standards need to be in place so that patient safety, so that we never hear
01:53again about a patient suffering this horrific pain?
01:57We never want another experience like this as well.
02:00And we are going to administer. Yes or no, do you think that stricter standards should be in place?
02:06We are going to follow the recommendations of HRSA and we are glad to have more
02:12oversight to make sure that we restore the public trust.
02:16Mr. Massa, moving on. And we've heard this from Dr. Lynch's testimony today.
02:23Do you or anyone in your organization play a role in retaliation against the incident
02:29reporter in the index case, who, according to the HRSA report, was fired from another job
02:35in the organ transplant space following outreach from CODA just two days after this committee's
02:42hearing last year when the index case was first discussed?
02:46No, sir. If you look at the facts, I welcome every member of the subcommittee to look at
02:52the actual facts of that case or of that situation. There was no retaliation. If there was retaliation,
03:00that would not be tolerated within Network for Hope.
03:03As the individual who is now in charge of the OPO, have you looked into any possible retaliation
03:09against this, retroactively looked at any retaliation against this or any other whistleblowers?
03:16I have.
03:17And what have you found?
03:19I found that in this case, specifically that we're talking about, there was no retaliation. And I go
03:26back to the letters that we sent to this committee on December 17th and January 3rd in response to
03:34that.
03:34Will you commit to us that if there is any incident that would occur in the future and it will be
03:41brought to the attention that there will be no retaliation, that you will work to make sure
03:47that those who bring these cases forward, where someone is undergoing addition and moving forward
03:52in the transplant process and is not felt to be an appropriate candidate, that there will be no
03:59efforts of retaliation against that individual?
04:01That is correct. And I can tell you that we have a policy in place that not only the expectation
04:08is to bring that forward, but it says in the policy, it is an obligation for anyone.
04:15Thank you for that commitment. And thank you for that obligation. Dr. Formica, it has been alleged
04:20that the OPTN has a history of dismissing and downplaying serious allegations of risk to patient safety,
04:26like in oversight of the index case, where you dismissed nearly proceedings with organ harvesting
04:33on a patient who ultimately was discharged from the hospital alive. And I'm quoting,
04:38you said, a nice story for the patient. Yes or no? Did the OPTN, under your leadership,
04:45adequately investigate and respond to all reported concerns?
04:49Chairman, I think this case highlights some of the challenges we face in the OPTN.
04:57I learned of this case after the NPSC had decided not to pursue that, when HRSA instructed us to begin
05:05the larger investigation. In retrospect, had I heard about that sooner, because I'm aware of the larger
05:12context of what's going on right now, I would have asked for a deeper investigation.
05:15So why did HRSA need to direct the OPTN to reopen their investigation of CODA and eventually issue a
05:22corrective action plan dictating how further action must be handled?
05:27I think that demonstrates the collaborative nature between the OPTN and HRSA, frankly,
05:32and I think that's why it works well. But if the safeguards were in place,
05:35would that have needed to occur? The OPTN is composed of volunteers who are also conducting
05:41their normal day jobs and were facilitated by contractors that help provide the infrastructure
05:47around which we provide our work. As we've moved through the transition period,
05:53some of that fluid communication back and forth has taken some time to work out new pathways.
05:58But you have all talked about trust, and now that trust has been violated. I think it's been fractured.
06:04Do you feel that that lack of communication that existed continues to exist today?
06:09I actually think it's getting better every day. When you've moved from an environment where you have
06:14one contractor facilitating all the activities of the OPTN to multiple contractors now facilitating that,
06:23it takes some time to work out the pathways. I think it is clear to all of us on this committee,
06:28both sides of the aisle, that that communication needs to improve, that collaboration needs to
06:34improve, and that there needs to be the safety of the patients that ultimately guides whether or not
06:40they are viable candidates for the transplants that are so necessary for the health of so many
06:47Americans. I thank the panel for being here today. I now yield.

Recommended