Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • yesterday
At a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Wednesday, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) spoke Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Michael Rigas about certain firings of individuals at the State Department.
Transcript
00:00Well, thank you, Mr. Chairman.
00:02Appreciate your testimony today, and certainly reorganizations can eliminate inefficiencies,
00:08but they can also raise a lot of questions about values.
00:12But one thing I was really struck by is the new guidance that has been put out
00:17for evaluating both mid-level and senior personnel in the State Department
00:22that basically uses the word fidelity,
00:25and essentially saying, how loyal are you and how quickly do you align yourself,
00:33and I'll quote, completely align oneself and one team to the most current USG goals.
00:38You know, back in 1981, I was a State Department fellow in India in between two years in graduate school.
00:45I was later admitted to the Foreign Service, but I turned it down.
00:48I was working as a presidential fellow for Secretary Weinberger in the Department of Defense.
00:52But I was really struck at that time.
00:56The State Department officers said, look, we develop extraordinary expertise in the field
01:02on complicated issues around the world.
01:04We funnel that information to help the decision makers back in D.C. make decisions.
01:11What I see emphasized in this list of promotion criteria,
01:15there's not a single thing in it that says developing regional expertise,
01:19language expertise, knowledge of complex issues, informing and helping shape the dialogue in a responsible way.
01:27There's nothing like that.
01:27It's all about loyalty, implementing whatever D.C. says.
01:32Are we completely devaluing our Foreign Service officers for their development of expertise
01:39that can help enlighten our own policy agenda?
01:42So, thank you for that question, Senator.
01:45So, the core precepts for promotion at the department were updated.
01:50The fidelity precept, which you just quoted, replaced the DEI precept.
01:56But it calls for fidelity to the Constitution of the United States.
01:59It calls for fidelity to executing the president's policy priorities,
02:05which, you know, we're in the executive branch.
02:06The president stood before the American people and went from one end of this country to the other
02:11saying what he wanted to do.
02:13And that policy agenda was ratified by the voters in November.
02:17And it's incumbent upon the career Foreign Service officers
02:21and the career Civil Service officers at the State Department
02:24and, indeed, at every other executive branch department
02:26to faithfully carry out what the president stood for before the American people.
02:31So, the American people have confidence that when they go to the ballot booth
02:34and elect a president that what they voted for will get implemented.
02:40Okay.
02:40Well, I will say that actually the criteria talk about how much you accentuate executive power
02:47under Article 2.
02:49And there is a huge debate going on now as we've seen ourselves slide into an authoritarian state,
02:54both the defunding of agencies, the firing of employees,
02:58the reorganizing without congressional direction are all factors assaulting the separation of powers,
03:05which is actually an assault on the Constitution of the United States.
03:08But I'm going to set that aside for the moment
03:10because I'm concerned about the values represented in this reorganization.
03:15And I'll give you some example.
03:17Firing the consular fraud prevention in passport operations
03:22makes no sense to me that our value is to allow fraud in passports.
03:26Second of all, firing the leadership team for the coordinator for Afghan relocation efforts.
03:33This is firing the team that's standing up for the people who stood with us in Afghanistan
03:37and now we are abandoning them.
03:40Abandoning our partners is not a value that I think our State Department should be promoting.
03:46Third, proceeding to terminate the personnel who were taking on the issue of Russian propaganda in Ukraine.
03:54I do not think promoting Russian propaganda is a value that our State Department should be promoting.
04:01Fourth, firing the experts on money laundering.
04:06Are you kidding me?
04:07That is now our strategy is to make sure that money laundering is easier around the world,
04:12not to mention that in areas of fast-changing technology,
04:18experts in quantum technology and AI were terminated.
04:21And let's look at one other case here.
04:25Firing the team that was working on war crimes committed by Russia and Ukraine.
04:29Our value is now that we don't care about war crimes.
04:33I don't think that's an American position.
04:36And finally, I'll note, firing the entire Bureau of Energy Resources,
04:40which carries on international energy policy,
04:42energy is critical to the future of our economy and success in the world.
04:47So these are not values that are American values.
04:50This reorganization was, as my colleague Chris Coons noted,
04:54hastily planned, poorly coordinated,
04:57and is going to do real damage to the security and success of the United States of America.
05:01Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
05:02Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
05:03Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
05:04Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
05:05Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
05:06Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
05:07Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
05:08Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
05:09Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
05:10Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
05:11Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
05:12Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
05:13Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
05:14Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
05:15Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
05:16Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
05:17Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
05:18Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
05:19Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
05:20Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
05:21Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.

Recommended