Skip to player
Skip to main content
Skip to footer
Search
Connect
Watch fullscreen
Like
Comments
Bookmark
Share
Add to Playlist
Report
Chris Murphy Sends Clear Warning About Alex Padilla’s Forced Removal From A DHS Briefing
Forbes Breaking News
Follow
5 days ago
During remarks on the Senate floor on Thursday, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) spoke about Sen. Alex Padilla's (D-CA) removal from a DHS press briefing.
Category
🗞
News
Transcript
Display full video transcript
00:00
Mr. President.
00:01
To recognize the senator from Connecticut.
00:04
Thank you, Mr. President.
00:06
Senator Booker and I have now spoken several times on the floor.
00:10
Senator from California has been here multiple times.
00:17
We were doing so because we saw the look in our colleague's eyes
00:21
as he was being violently thrown out of that room.
00:26
You lost contact with his eyes in the hallway as he was being pushed
00:31
stomach down onto the ground and handcuffed.
00:37
One of our colleagues suggested that Senator Padilla got what he wanted.
00:43
If you saw Senator Padilla's eyes, if you saw Alex's eyes as he was being pushed out of that room,
00:49
you saw a man who did not expect to be treated that way,
00:52
who thought that he was coming to register his dissent, his objection,
00:57
to something deeply serious and illegal that was happening in his state.
01:04
He had a responsibility as a senator to speak truth to power.
01:09
And so we are here on this floor speaking repeatedly
01:13
in hopes that at some point, some of our Republican colleagues,
01:18
whether here or in other public statements,
01:20
will register some degree of concern for what happened to their colleague.
01:28
We lose our democracy if we lose our ability to dissent.
01:32
In 1722, in a newspaper started in Boston
01:42
by the name of the New England Current,
01:44
one of the country's first newspapers,
01:46
a series of essays began to appear
01:50
that were speaking to some really radical ideas for 1722.
01:56
This is 20 years before Thomas Jefferson was born.
01:59
This was 50 years before Thomas Paine wrote Common Sense.
02:04
This is 1722.
02:07
And the author's name is Silence Duguid.
02:11
Silence Duguid writes in the New England Current,
02:15
whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation
02:18
must begin by subduing the freedom of speech,
02:25
a thing terrible to public traitors.
02:28
Silence goes on to say this sacred privilege of free speech
02:35
is so essential to free government
02:38
that the security and prosperity
02:40
and the freedom of speech always go together.
02:47
And in those wretched countries
02:48
where a man cannot call his tongue his own,
02:52
he can scarce call anything his own.
02:56
In 1722, this was a radical idea.
03:01
This idea that a tyrant
03:04
must control the freedom of thought with violence
03:10
in order to maintain control of the people.
03:15
The New England Current was owned by a man named James Franklin.
03:20
And he probably didn't know that Silence Duguid
03:24
was a pseudonym for his 16-year-old brother
03:27
named Benjamin Franklin.
03:31
That's Benjamin Franklin, writing in 1722,
03:36
16 years old.
03:38
Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation
03:40
must begin by subduing the freedom of speech.
03:44
What happened to Senator Padilla today,
03:50
it does stand in context.
03:54
I say again, it does matter
03:56
that on that day in which violence
04:01
was used against the United States Capitol
04:05
as a means to try to upset our democracy,
04:09
it was cheered on by a president
04:10
who then pardoned those violent rioters.
04:16
It stands in the context of the arrest
04:20
of a mayor in New Jersey
04:23
and a congressperson seeking to do
04:25
normal and regular oversight.
04:28
It stands in context
04:30
with the use of the FCC
04:32
to try to intimidate and harass
04:35
news stations
04:37
that carry coverage unfavorable to the president.
04:42
It stands in context of
04:43
the banning of outlets
04:45
having access to the White House or the Pentagon
04:47
simply because they don't write things
04:49
that are favorable to the president
04:50
and use terms that are favorable
04:52
to the president.
04:58
If we lose our democracy,
05:00
it's not likely that there's going to be
05:02
this one moment,
05:04
this one day,
05:05
this one fight.
05:07
It won't be
05:08
like other
05:10
revolutions
05:12
where the parliament building
05:15
gets burned down
05:16
or a coup occurs.
05:19
No, it will be
05:20
that over time
05:22
the message has been sent
05:24
that if you speak up
05:26
against the government,
05:27
there is a price
05:28
to be paid
05:30
and that price
05:30
involves violence.
05:34
But if you use violence
05:36
on behalf of
05:38
the government,
05:40
it will be excused.
05:44
And so
05:45
why we are
05:48
still on this floor tonight
05:49
is
05:50
sure,
05:51
we have immense respect
05:53
for our colleague
05:54
and I believe
05:54
and I believe he has respect
05:55
across the aisle.
05:57
Senator Pity is a decent
05:58
human servant
05:59
who doesn't deserve
06:00
to be treated
06:01
that way.
06:03
We're here because
06:04
he's our friend
06:05
and our colleague.
06:06
But we are also here
06:08
because
06:09
too many
06:11
in this body
06:12
take for granted
06:13
that this democracy
06:15
is natural,
06:16
that it is just going
06:16
to hang around
06:17
no matter the threats.
06:19
the effort
06:22
that this administration
06:23
is undergoing
06:24
to excuse
06:26
and normalize
06:27
violence
06:27
when it happens
06:29
in
06:29
advancement
06:32
of the administration's
06:33
political priorities
06:34
and then to suppress
06:36
non-violent speech
06:39
in a multitude
06:41
of ways.
06:43
When it objects
06:44
to this administration's
06:45
priorities,
06:46
it sends
06:46
a message
06:47
to the public
06:49
about what you can
06:51
get away with
06:51
and what you can't
06:52
get away with.
06:53
Now, I don't think
06:54
this will be the result.
06:55
I don't think
06:55
the American people
06:56
will be bullied
06:57
into silence.
06:58
I do not believe
06:59
they will watch
07:00
that clip
07:01
of Alex Padilla
07:02
being forced
07:04
to the ground
07:05
and handcuffed
07:06
and decide
07:08
to stay home.
07:08
No, I think,
07:09
in fact,
07:10
the opposite
07:10
will likely happen.
07:12
I think more
07:13
Americans
07:14
will be out there
07:15
protesting
07:16
this government.
07:18
I think
07:18
more Americans
07:19
will decide
07:20
to be present
07:22
this weekend
07:22
to stand up
07:23
for the right
07:24
of free speech.
07:27
But if that
07:28
were to be the case,
07:29
it would be
07:29
the exception
07:30
to the historical rule
07:32
because in most
07:34
countries,
07:35
when a ruler
07:37
uses violence
07:38
in order to
07:40
suppress dissent,
07:41
it works.
07:43
People decide
07:44
that they don't
07:45
want to risk
07:45
the fate
07:48
of Alex Padilla.
07:50
They don't want
07:51
to be on the ground
07:53
with their hands
07:54
forced behind them
07:57
and put into handcuffs.
07:58
They stay home
07:59
and they just
08:01
let the tyranny
08:03
wash over
08:04
their community
08:05
and their country.
08:06
We're not there yet.
08:07
I don't mean
08:08
to exercise
08:10
hyperbole.
08:10
What I seek
08:11
to say is that
08:12
we should not
08:13
take this democracy
08:14
for granted
08:15
and that there
08:18
can be,
08:21
history tells us,
08:22
there often is
08:23
a deep impact
08:26
when violence
08:27
is used
08:28
against those
08:29
who are protesting
08:30
the regime.
08:31
It becomes
08:32
normalized
08:32
and it ends up
08:34
scaring many people
08:36
into a descent
08:37
away from civic
08:38
participation
08:39
and that
08:39
is where
08:40
our democracy
08:42
dies.
08:44
This sacred
08:44
privilege,
08:45
the privilege
08:46
of free speech,
08:47
the privilege
08:48
to protest
08:49
your government,
08:49
says 16-year-old
08:51
Benjamin Franklin,
08:52
is so essential
08:54
to free government
08:56
that the security
08:58
of prosperity
08:59
and the freedom
09:00
of speech
09:01
always go
09:03
together.
09:05
Men cannot
09:06
be prosperous,
09:07
he says,
09:08
without having
09:10
access
09:11
to the freedom
09:12
of expression.
09:17
Senator Padilla
09:17
was doing
09:18
his job.
09:20
Sure,
09:21
you can decide
09:22
that he was
09:22
being disrespectful,
09:25
but that's
09:25
not illegal.
09:27
You could
09:28
decide
09:30
that he,
09:32
in the alternative,
09:33
should have
09:33
waited until
09:34
the press conference
09:35
is over,
09:35
but nothing he did
09:36
warranted the
09:38
treatment he got.
09:40
And when you
09:41
stand it side
09:42
by side
09:42
with the
09:43
pardoning
09:43
of the
09:44
January 6th
09:44
protesters,
09:45
the attempt
09:46
to bully
09:47
the free press
09:49
into towing
09:50
the administration's
09:51
line,
09:52
the deployment
09:53
of the National
09:54
Guard
09:54
and the Marines
09:55
to a protest
09:59
to a protest in
09:59
California that
10:00
was largely
10:01
peaceful and
10:01
basically just
10:03
encompassed one
10:04
or two square
10:05
blocks,
10:06
nobody mistakes
10:09
what that agenda
10:10
is about.
10:11
That agenda
10:12
is about
10:13
trying to bully
10:16
the American
10:18
people into
10:19
silence.
10:20
And once again,
10:21
the first several
10:22
comments from our
10:23
colleagues
10:23
justifying
10:25
the handcuffing
10:28
and violence
10:29
to Senator
10:30
Padilla
10:30
simply because
10:32
they believe
10:32
he was
10:33
disrespectful
10:33
paints a
10:36
really dangerous
10:37
picture of
10:37
where we're
10:38
heading.
10:42
Senator Booker
10:43
is right.
10:45
The focus
10:46
should be on
10:47
the violence
10:48
that's being
10:48
done to the
10:49
American people's
10:50
health care
10:50
right now.
10:51
We're debating
10:53
a bill right
10:53
now as we
10:54
speak to rip
10:55
health care
10:55
away from
10:57
upwards of
10:57
15 million
10:59
Americans.
10:59
That's
10:59
extraordinary.
11:00
That's a
11:01
health care
11:02
catastrophe.
11:03
That's not
11:03
just 15
11:04
million people
11:04
losing their
11:05
health care.
11:05
That's
11:05
hospitals,
11:06
drug treatment
11:07
centers,
11:09
health clinics
11:10
shutting down
11:11
when you
11:12
pull almost
11:13
a trillion
11:14
dollars out
11:14
of the
11:15
Medicaid
11:15
system.
11:17
There's a
11:17
new budget
11:17
analysis today
11:18
that shows
11:19
that the
11:20
poorest 30
11:21
percent of
11:22
the country,
11:23
40 percent
11:24
of the
11:24
country,
11:25
will be
11:25
poorer after
11:26
this bill
11:27
passes,
11:28
just so that
11:28
the richest
11:29
10 or 20
11:31
percent can
11:32
get a massive
11:33
new tax cut.
11:34
In fact,
11:34
the richest
11:34
people in
11:35
this country
11:35
will get an
11:36
average
11:36
$270,000
11:38
tax cut.
11:40
Literally a
11:41
transfer of
11:41
wealth from
11:42
the poorest
11:42
people in
11:43
this country.
11:44
People who
11:44
are working
11:44
minimum wage
11:45
jobs are
11:46
going to be
11:47
poorer after
11:48
having passed
11:49
this bill
11:49
in order
11:50
to enrich
11:51
the folks
11:52
who are
11:52
doing super
11:53
well and
11:54
we're going
11:54
to add
11:54
$3 trillion
11:55
to the
11:56
deficit.
11:57
Just going
11:57
to put it
11:58
on our
11:58
kids'
11:58
credit card.
12:00
That's maybe
12:01
the most
12:01
unpopular
12:02
major piece
12:02
of legislation
12:03
that has
12:03
ever come
12:04
before the
12:04
United States
12:05
Senate.
12:06
That's an
12:07
agenda that
12:08
you probably
12:09
can only
12:09
impose on
12:10
the nation
12:10
by force.
12:12
By force.
12:14
Because if
12:15
people have
12:15
the right
12:16
to protest,
12:17
if they
12:17
have the
12:18
ability to
12:19
stand up
12:20
to the
12:22
most massive
12:22
transfer of
12:23
wealth from
12:24
the poor
12:24
and the
12:25
middle class
12:25
to the
12:26
rich in
12:26
the history
12:27
of the
12:27
country,
12:27
it might
12:28
not pass.
12:30
That protest
12:31
movement might
12:31
be big enough
12:32
in order to
12:33
change the
12:34
minds of
12:34
enough members
12:36
of this
12:36
body so
12:37
that that
12:37
agenda
12:38
might pass.
12:42
It may
12:42
be that
12:43
that bill
12:43
is so
12:44
unpopular
12:44
that the
12:45
only way
12:46
that you
12:46
can get
12:47
it to
12:47
pass
12:47
is by
12:51
using
12:51
violence
12:51
and the
12:52
threat
12:52
of
12:52
violence
12:52
to
12:53
suppress
12:53
protest
12:55
and
12:55
free
12:56
speech.
12:59
So
12:59
we are
13:01
still here
13:02
hours after
13:03
this incident
13:04
because we
13:05
care about
13:05
our colleague,
13:07
because we
13:07
believe this
13:08
is ultimately
13:09
going to do
13:09
immense damage
13:10
to this
13:10
institution
13:11
that we
13:11
love.
13:14
I've
13:14
done hard
13:16
work with
13:16
many of my
13:17
Republican
13:17
colleagues.
13:18
I deeply
13:18
care about
13:19
many of my
13:20
Republican
13:20
colleagues.
13:21
I don't
13:21
know all
13:22
of them
13:22
well,
13:23
but I
13:25
know enough
13:25
of them
13:25
to know
13:26
that there
13:26
are patriots,
13:27
there are
13:28
people who
13:28
believe that
13:30
America
13:30
matters more
13:31
than our
13:33
party.
13:35
I showed
13:35
that video
13:36
to several
13:38
of my
13:38
Republican
13:39
colleagues
13:39
as we
13:39
were leaving
13:40
the chamber
13:41
today.
13:42
I saw
13:42
their jaws
13:43
drop.
13:43
I know
13:44
their human
13:45
reaction to
13:46
what they
13:47
saw, but I
13:48
also know
13:48
that there
13:48
is a
13:49
tendency in
13:50
this version
13:51
of the
13:51
Republican
13:52
Party to
13:52
circle the
13:53
wagons around
13:53
one message
13:54
that if
13:55
Democrats say
13:56
X, then
13:56
Republicans have
13:57
to say Y.
13:58
That doesn't
13:58
have to be
13:59
the case
13:59
every time.
14:00
It just
14:00
doesn't.
14:02
There can
14:02
be true
14:03
things, and
14:04
a true
14:04
thing is
14:05
this.
14:07
That was
14:08
an excessive
14:09
impermissible
14:11
amount of
14:12
force that
14:13
was used
14:13
on Senator
14:14
Padilla
14:14
today.
14:14
We can
14:15
say that
14:15
together.
14:16
Even if
14:17
you agree
14:19
with the
14:19
President on
14:20
his decision
14:20
to deploy
14:21
the National
14:21
Guard,
14:23
even if
14:24
you hate
14:25
every single
14:25
one of
14:25
those
14:26
protesters,
14:28
even if
14:29
you don't
14:30
like Senator
14:30
Padilla,
14:32
which is
14:33
hard,
14:35
because he's
14:35
a freaking
14:36
hard guy
14:37
not to
14:37
like, but
14:38
even if
14:39
you believe
14:39
all those
14:40
things, you
14:40
can say
14:41
that what
14:42
happened
14:42
today is
14:43
not all
14:43
right, and
14:46
that the
14:46
White House
14:46
should admit
14:47
that, that
14:47
there should
14:47
be an
14:48
apology, and
14:50
that there
14:50
should be
14:50
protocols set
14:52
in place to
14:52
make sure
14:53
that if a
14:53
United States
14:53
senator shows
14:54
up to a
14:56
public event,
14:57
he didn't
14:58
bust into a
14:58
private meeting.
14:59
This was a
15:00
press conference
15:01
designed to
15:04
be public,
15:05
to transmit
15:06
public information.
15:07
He wanted
15:07
to make
15:07
sure that
15:08
that was
15:08
accurate
15:09
information.
15:09
Maybe you
15:10
don't like
15:10
the way
15:10
that he
15:11
did it,
15:11
but what
15:12
he did
15:12
is not
15:12
illegal.
15:13
What he
15:13
did does
15:14
not deserve
15:14
that treatment.
15:15
We can
15:15
decide that
15:18
that's wrong.
15:19
We can
15:20
recognize the
15:22
danger to
15:23
this concept
15:24
of free
15:25
speech defended
15:26
in 1722 by
15:28
a 16-year-old
15:29
Benjamin Franklin
15:30
is serious
15:32
enough for
15:33
us to
15:33
speak together
15:34
with one
15:35
voice.
15:36
So my
15:38
Republican
15:38
colleagues may
15:39
think that we
15:39
are belaboring
15:40
the point,
15:41
but this is
15:44
an important
15:45
moment for
15:47
the Senate
15:47
and for the
15:47
nation.
15:50
I yield the
15:50
floor.
Recommended
8:01
|
Up next
BREAKING: Mahmoud Khalil Holds Press Gaggle With AOC After Being Released From Immigration Detention
Forbes Breaking News
today
1:25
Mahmoud Khalil: I Will Continue To Speak Up For Palestinians ‘Even If They Would Kill Me’
Forbes Breaking News
today
3:55
‘An Assault On The Rule Of Law’: Chris Murphy Responds To Padilla Being Removed From Noem’s DHS Briefing
Forbes Breaking News
6/12/2025
3:44
Brian Schatz Sends Clear Warning About Alex Padilla’s Removal From DHS Briefing: ’The Stuff Of Dictatorships’
Forbes Breaking News
6/12/2025
10:59
Chris Murphy: 'Some Of Our Republican Colleagues Have To Speak Out' To Defend Alex Padilla
Forbes Breaking News
6/13/2025
2:07
Jeff Merkley Warns That Padilla’s Forced Removal From A DHS Briefing Is Authoritarian Behavior
Forbes Breaking News
6/13/2025
5:32
Alex Padilla Recounts What He Was Thinking As He Was Handcuffed And Escorted Out Of Noem's Briefing
Forbes Breaking News
3 days ago
6:01
This Is How GOP Senators Reacted To Video Of Padilla Being Removed From Briefing: Blunt Rochester
Forbes Breaking News
6/12/2025
10:06
'This Is What Dictatorships Look Like': Chris Van Hollen Decries The Removal Of Padilla From DHS Hearing
Forbes Breaking News
6/13/2025
6:03
Adam Schiff Responds To Padilla Being Forcibly Removed From DHS Sec. Kristi Noem’s Briefing
Forbes Breaking News
6/12/2025
4:34
Mark Kelly Responds To Removal Of Alex Padilla From Kristi Noem's Press Briefing
Forbes Breaking News
6/12/2025
25:58
Democrats And Republicans React To Alex Padilla Being Forcibly Removed From Noem's Briefing
Forbes Breaking News
6/13/2025
16:49
Cory Booker Condemns The Removal Of Alex Padilla From Secretary Kristi Noem’s DHS Press Briefing
Forbes Breaking News
5 days ago
24:35
‘Americans Did Not Ask For This’: Schiff Condemns Alex Padilla’s Forced Removal From A DHS Briefing
Forbes Breaking News
6/13/2025
5:10
'An Attack To Shut Him Up': Kaine Blasts Trump Administration After Padilla Forcibly Removed From Briefing
Forbes Breaking News
6/13/2025
11:35
‘When Does It Stop?’: Cory Booker Decries Alex Padilla’s Removal From Noem’s DHS Press Briefing
Forbes Breaking News
6/12/2025
4:21
Patty Murray: ‘Never Come This Close To... Tears’ On Senate Floor After Padilla's Removal From Noem Brief
Forbes Breaking News
6/12/2025
0:46
Alex Padilla Forcibly Removed From DHS Sec. Kristi Noem Press Conference
Forbes Breaking News
6/12/2025
4:54
'This Is A Horrifying Moment': Warren Reacts To Alex Padilla's Removal From Sec. Noem Presser
Forbes Breaking News
6/13/2025
1:48
Chuck Schumer Calls For Investigation Into The Forced Removal Of Padilla From A DHS Briefing
Forbes Breaking News
6/12/2025
2:33
Thom Tillis Reacts To Padilla Arrest, Says Both Sides 'Own Some Responsibility For What Happened'
Forbes Breaking News
3 days ago
0:52
'What You See In Totalitarian Regimes': Chuck Schumer Torches DHS Secretary Kristi Noem Over Alex Padilla Arrest
Forbes Breaking News
4 days ago
6:37
Dems Attempt To Adjourn The House After Alex Padilla Was 'Illegally Attacked' At DHS Briefing
Forbes Breaking News
6/12/2025
2:08
‘Truly Horrifying’: Ron Wyden Condemns Alex Padilla’s Removal From Noem Briefing As ‘Un-American’
Forbes Breaking News
6/12/2025
3:48
Alex Padilla Addresses Forcible Removal From Kristi Noem's Press Briefing
Forbes Breaking News
6/13/2025