Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 6/10/2025
During a House Appropriations Committee hearing last week, Rep. Marie Glusenkamp Perez (D-WA) questioned OMB Director Russell Vought about procedural burdens on civil servants.
Transcript
00:00Lusenkamp-Perez for five minutes.
00:01Thank you, Chair.
00:02Thank you, Director, for being here.
00:07I used to run my husband's own auto repair and machine shop.
00:10I will never forget having an OSHA inspector come to my shop
00:13and ask me if my AC machine was a welder.
00:17The divorce of theory from practice,
00:20respect for people who have done the work,
00:22and who has the authority and the knowledge.
00:25My question to you is,
00:29how are you adapting your staffing decisions
00:33to ensure that it is not just a Sterling resume
00:36who is in your office,
00:39but people who have done the work,
00:40respect for the trades?
00:42How many people do you have in your office
00:44who don't have a college degree?
00:45I don't know the answer to that question.
00:46I come from a family of electricians,
00:49so that is my background.
00:53I've been very enthusiastic.
00:55and excited about the policy proposals
00:57we had in the first term
00:58that I'm sure are working themselves
01:00through this one as well
01:01to ensure that we're not expecting people
01:05to have college degrees
01:06and Sterling resumes that might show itself.
01:10But if someone can do the job,
01:12we want them at OMB as it pertains to our agency.
01:14One kind of theoretical question I have here
01:17is that, you know,
01:18I think Wendell Berry said
01:19that excellent workmanship
01:21as with a breaking plow is destructive.
01:23Efficiency itself,
01:25it's not useful.
01:27It is efficiency towards what?
01:29It's about effectiveness.
01:31It's about a question of like,
01:32what are we trying to do here?
01:33What is the purpose of this bill?
01:34And my question to you is like,
01:40all of this claims of pursuing efficiency,
01:44but the question is effectiveness.
01:46Like that is the true goal.
01:47How are you implementing
01:48what my community needs in these systems?
01:52And a lot of that, in my view,
01:54comes down to the question
01:55of procedural burden on civil servants.
01:57So, if you're successful in your pursuits,
02:01we will soon have a much smaller field of civil servants.
02:05Who is going to reduce the procedural burden
02:08on those civil servants to pursue effectiveness?
02:11Well, I think, you know,
02:12government efficiency is not meant
02:15to sum the totality of what you want
02:17from a federal government.
02:18I think it's meant to articulate an imbalance
02:21that we've seen in recent years
02:23and to correct for that imbalance.
02:25And so, that's the partnership
02:27with whatever department or agency you're dealing with,
02:30is they have been given responsibilities by Congress
02:33to go and perform functions
02:36on behalf of the American people.
02:38And the Department of Government Efficiency,
02:40and to OMB to a large extent historically,
02:43is designed to make sure the work that they do
02:47is done in the best way possible.
02:50But I'm honestly, Congresswoman,
02:53I'm one of these people that encourages OMB
02:56not to ask the efficiency question first and foremost,
02:59but to ask both in serving the president
03:02or the laws that you all have given us,
03:05what is trying to be accomplished by this?
03:07And let's make sure we accomplish it.
03:09And then you've earned the right
03:11to figure out how to do it most efficiently.
03:14Yeah.
03:14My concern is that right now,
03:16it's a process of randomly scapegoating civil servants
03:18and not a pursuit of...
03:20Many of those people are exactly the people
03:22who could tell you what kind of bullshit paperwork
03:24they're putting up with.
03:26And so how to have not just a managerial class
03:29tell you what is appropriate,
03:31but actually the people who are doing the work
03:32who should be part of that process
03:34of pointing out what the unproductive,
03:38you know, proceduralism is.
03:41I agree with you.
03:44I want to know what career staff thinks.
03:47It's a hallmark of my time at OMB.
03:51And I hate the paperwork that we often put on agencies
03:54to perform and do things that are not designed
03:58to actually lead to better outcomes.
04:01And so we have a deregulatory side
04:04for the agencies doing the work
04:06as it comes to GIPRA
04:07and other things on the management side.
04:09So I know you're a Christian.
04:11You might know the verse in Isaiah chapter 5, verse 8.
04:14It says,
04:14Woe to those who add farm to farm
04:17and house to house
04:18till they are the sole inhabitants of the land.
04:21This is, I think,
04:22I hope a sentiment that we share,
04:24but the presidential budget calls
04:25for a 10% reduction
04:27in the Federal Trade Commission's competition budget
04:28and a static budget
04:30for the Department of Justice Antitrust Division
04:32and reduction in the size of the workforce.
04:34So how will reducing the budget
04:35and staff of the antitrust agencies
04:37bring down the cost of living
04:39and ensure that small businesses like mine
04:41can compete on a fair level playing field
04:43without a regulatory mode
04:46or antitrust forces holding us down?
04:50Look, we think it's a priority.
04:51We have given the Department of Justice
04:54and the FTC the resources that they've asked for.
04:57And we don't necessarily value everything
05:00by the dollar amount that is given,
05:02but we do think it's important
05:03and it's something that our leadership there
05:07will continue to pursue.
05:09You'll be back.

Recommended