Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 6/5/2025
At today's House Education & Workforce Committee hearing, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) questioned Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer.
Transcript
00:00Thank the gentleman. Now, I recognize the gentlelady from Minnesota for five minutes of questioning, Ms. Omar.
00:06Thank you, Madam Secretary, for being here with us and watching the hearing earlier.
00:12I learned that you're also a former union member.
00:15My father was a teamster.
00:16Ah, okay. All right. I'm a former AFSCME member.
00:19So, I wanted to talk a little bit about the child labor enforcement.
00:27In two appropriations hearings last month, you expressed a firm commitment to fighting illegal child labor.
00:34At the same time, your agency has decimated ILAP, including its work, to prevent child labor.
00:41Your budget proposal will weaken a historically under-resourced wage and hour division.
00:46The nominee to be your solicitor of labor wrote a chapter in Project 2025,
00:55which literally calls for the rolling back of child labor laws.
00:59Madam Secretary, can you assure this committee that you will not propose any rollbacks of child labor rules
01:06that prevent children from being employed in hazardous occupations?
01:10I commit to fighting against all child labor exploitation.
01:15Absolutely, in this country, we do not want to exploit our children.
01:19Consistent with putting the American worker first, the budget does streamline ILAP.
01:24It is one of the agency heads, agency departments, that protect the American worker
01:31and protect against child labor violations.
01:34The budget provides for about $70 million to ILAP, including $38 million in grant funding,
01:39while restoring ILAP's emphasis on putting the American worker first.
01:41So that's a long way of you saying yes?
01:44I will work absolutely to combat all child labor.
01:47Wonderful.
01:48Many workers across the country will feel the impacts of your staffing and funding cuts to WHD and OSHA.
01:56As of May 2025, WHD employs just 611 investigators nationwide.
02:06This is the lowest number since at least 1973,
02:11even though there are nearly 10 times as many workers and businesses for them to cover.
02:17Your budget proposal cutting the office by $25 million, with staffing projected to fall.
02:25Your budget would also cut OSHA inspectors by over 12%,
02:31even though currently it will take 185 years to inspect every workplace just once.
02:39Madam Secretary, what is the plan to keep workers safe when you're slashing enforcement?
02:45Yeah, no, thank you again.
02:47You know, again, one of the overall core missions is to protect the American worker,
02:52and that includes in the wage and hour division as well.
02:54And while we are streamlining and doing some cost saving for the American taxpayer,
02:59we will always be in compliance with our statutory requirements.
03:02Well, that isn't, Madam Secretary, if I can just interrupt for one second.
03:06At one point, DOGE was set to close 20 WHD field offices and 11 OSHA offices.
03:14If this is happening, how will this protect workers?
03:17So, the offices that we have been, that were originally proposed through GSA,
03:25we have worked with to bring them online.
03:28I don't think that that is a good use of the compliance issue that we have to protect the American worker.
03:34And through the DRP, none of our essential workers, either through wage and hour, through OSHA, through MSHA,
03:41were able to take those because we know we need those investigators on the ground to protect the American worker,
03:46and I advocated for that.
03:48Yeah, but having fewer investigators and inspectors will not protect workers from wage theft,
03:56misclassification, and dangerous working conditions.
03:59So, how are you going to operate with less, even though we didn't even have enough to begin with?
04:04Well, it depends on what the priorities are from the past administration, but in this administration...
04:08Are inspections not priorities?
04:10They are priorities to protect the American worker.
04:11But with less inspectors, you can't do investigations.
04:14What we don't want to do is weaponize the use of those funding dollars against...
04:18How is there weaponization if you are...
04:21If it's going to take you 187 years to complete inspections,
04:27and you are cutting the inspectors that are supposed to do those inspections,
04:31the math is not mathing.
04:33Well, statutorily, we will protect the American worker.
04:36We did not have any of our investigators currently.
04:38We're not able to take the DRP in order so that they can be assigned to the job that they are required to...
04:43So, are you saying that you're going to hire more investigators to do inspections?
04:47What I'm saying is, we did not allow our statutorily mandated offices that we need essential workers,
04:54like our investigators, through Wage and Hour, through MSHA, and through OSHA,
04:59to take the DRP because they are essential to protecting the American worker in these industries.
05:04We can still cost-save and do the job that we need to do.
05:07So, American workers can expect that you will expedite investigations to make sure that we are assuring their safety?
05:13American workers can expect that the Department of Labor will protect the American worker
05:18as it is a core mission of the Department of Labor.
05:20I hope you keep that promise.
05:22I yield back.
05:23I thank the gentleman.

Recommended