Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 5/21/2025
At a House Appropriations Committee hearing on Wednesday, Rep. Grace Meng (D-NY) questioned Sec. Marco Rubio about Congressional appropriated funding.
Transcript
00:00Privilege to recognize Ms. Meng now.
00:02Thank you, Mr. Chairman and Ranking Member.
00:05Thank you, Mr. Secretary, for being here today.
00:08First, I wanted to continue to urge you and the President to do everything in your power
00:13to bring home the 58 hostages who Hamas still holds in captivity.
00:18That includes four American citizens, Itai Khan, Gadi Hagai, Judith Weinstein Hagai, and Omer Nutra.
00:25And I want to urge you to continue efforts to please get humanitarian aid into Gaza
00:31and make sure it's getting to Palestinian civilians and not Hamas.
00:37Mr. Secretary, I, too, am extremely concerned that your actions will prevent the State Department
00:44from fulfilling requirements under federal law to comply with congressional directives
00:50and fund programs that Congress agrees, bipartisan agreement, are a priority.
00:56One example is Basic Education, authorized by the Reinforcing Education Accountability and Development, or READ Act.
01:05This is a bill that you personally introduced in 2017,
01:08and I was proud to co-lead its reauthorization last year in the House.
01:13However, during your review of foreign aid, you personally canceled all international basic education programs.
01:21As a result, an estimated 44 million learners will lose access to education, vocational,
01:27and workforce development programs supported by the U.S. government.
01:32These are programs that make us safer, stronger, and more prosperous
01:36by building stability and helping kids stay in school.
01:40This is statutory. Under federal law, you are required to spend these funds.
01:46What is your plan to fulfill the congressional directives of the READ Act
01:50and ensure millions of children around the world can stay in school?
01:54Well, number one, we always look at, I would characterize that as development assistance,
01:59because that's what it is.
02:00You're trying to build the development capabilities of a country,
02:02and I think those would have to be driven.
02:04You know, we would be open to doing programs that work,
02:06but they would have to be driven because an embassy or a regional bureau thinks
02:09these kinds of programs will work in this particular setting,
02:12as opposed to this global view on it.
02:14But just because something's called something nice doesn't necessarily mean that's what it's delivering on.
02:18There are many of these programs where, frankly, if you talk to the partner nation,
02:21they would say, I'll give you an example.
02:23I was recently in one of the Caribbean nations,
02:25and they're very grateful for help with schools,
02:27but their number one need is security.
02:29They have to build up their police departments and their security assistance.
02:32So they would tell you, before we can focus on our educational systems,
02:35we want to build capacity in our law enforcement so we can provide security
02:39so that then our society can flourish and that could be possible.
02:42That doesn't mean education is not important.
02:43It just means that the nation has identified that as a more important need,
02:49and we want to have the flexibility to be able to prioritize what could be most helpful.
02:53So that I agree, and we would love to work with you on potential legislation
02:59and programming on safety and security.
03:02But this legislation, it's not just something that sounds nice and has a pretty title.
03:06We worked on this together, the Senate, the House, Republicans, Democrats.
03:11It's something that's important and keeps us safe, and that is statutory.
03:16That is something that has been touched.
03:18And so I wanted to follow up also in the same vein with international family planning
03:24and reproductive health programs.
03:26You have also canceled all of these programs.
03:29These programs are life-saving.
03:32In 2024 alone, they were estimated to save the lives of 34,000 women and girls,
03:38prevent over 5 million unsafe abortions,
03:41and serve over 47 million women and couples around the world with modern contraceptive care.
03:47You are statutorily required to spend $575 million in bilateral international planning awards
03:55as Congress provided in 2024.
03:58What is the plan?
04:00There's no plan.
04:01As I said, on those programs, with regards to that, there's no plan to spend that money.
04:04We're not going to be in that business globally.
04:07I mean, we're not going to do it.
04:08So it doesn't matter that Congress passed the law?
04:11Well, the money that's been appropriated is for that purpose, but the money that's been spent,
04:17those programs, the way that money was being spent and the specific uses,
04:21we're not going to continue to do it in that same way.
04:23What is the plan then?
04:25I know you talked about reorganization.
04:28Again, all of those funds that will be brought under one of the two buckets of humanitarian assistance.
04:33It could be development assistance.
04:34It could be refugee and migration assistance.
04:36We will work with Congress to find a way to channel those funds in a way that complies with the statute,
04:41but at the same time are not funding activities that the administration feels is outside even the purview of the statute.
04:47I just want to say that that is statute.
04:49That is law.
04:50And contrary to your testimony, you are touching and changing it.
04:54And you said you wanted to work together with Congress.
04:57On April 24th, almost 90 members sent you a letter about these programs requesting a response.
05:03We still have not received a response.
05:06I respect that you say you want to work with us, but we need more than words.
05:10We need actions.
05:11You'll get a response.
05:12What day was that letter?
05:13April 24th.
05:15Thank you very much.
05:16I yield back.

Recommended