National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett Speaks To Jake Tapper About Trump's Tariffs

Forbes Breaking News

On Sunday, White House National Economic Council Director, Kevin Hassett spoke to CNN's Jake Tapper about President Trump's tariff policies.

Transcript

00:00White House National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett. Kevin, good to see you again.

00:04So the White House says everything that happened over the last week and a half went according to plan.

00:10Over the course of just a few days, the global market lost trillions in stock value,

00:13regained some of it, but not all of it. The strength of the dollar right now is plunging.

00:17Consumer sentiment is worse than at any time during the Great Recession. Is all of this part of the plan?

00:24Right. In fact, let's talk about what the trade plan is, because I think that it's very,

00:28very important for people to understand why we're doing what we're doing and how we got to the point

00:33where this is the right strategy. The bottom line is that in the United States, there are these things

00:39called 232s. You've heard people talk about it. It's a trade action where the government decides

00:45that there's something that's a serious threat to national security if we don't do something about

00:49it. And so an example, just hypothetical, would be supposed that in order to protect ourselves from

00:55an adversary, we had cannons, but we had to buy the cannonballs from them. Well, then you could put

01:00a 232 tariff on the cannonball and then we'd have to make it here. And then that would make it so that

01:06if we ever did have a situation where we're in conflict, that we'd had everything we need to

01:11protect ourselves. And so the 232 things were always excluded. They weren't covered by the new actions

01:17that you discussed at the opening. And so it's not like, so for example, semiconductors are the key

01:22important part of a lot of defense equipment. And there's going to be a semiconductor 232

01:28that studies those things carefully and decides what it has to, what has to be onshore in order

01:33to protect America. And so it was always the case in annex two in the reciprocal act that

01:38semiconductors were going to not be covered by that action because there's a 232 action that was

01:43announced in the executive order that is going to address it. And so I don't think that anything

01:50really should be a surprise if people stopped and studied, but it seems like a lot of the coverage,

01:55people are in a rush to get the coverage out and didn't really think through the logic of it,

01:58which is why we have a longer form show with you here, right, Jake, where we can talk about what

02:02exactly is going on. And then finally, why is it that people think that there is an emergency about

02:07this? Well, it's because especially over the last four years, the influence of China into every

02:14little corner of our country has just gotten bigger and bigger and bigger. And so it actually is the

02:19case that it's a very uncomfortable amount of Chinese input in our actual weapons systems,

02:25Jake, in our actual weapons systems. And so President Trump thinks it's urgent that we

02:29address these matters. Okay, let's talk about the overall investment environment. Nine days ago,

02:35President Trump announced to the whole world that those were the rules for doing business in America

02:40going forward. The tariffs were here to stay. His policies were not going to change. I'm just quoting

02:44him from his truth social messages. And then, of course, on Wednesday, he issued this 90-day

02:50pause on most of the tariffs. And in his own words, it was because the bond markets were getting queasy

02:54and yippy. So here's what one small business owner told CNN about the impact that this whiplash

03:01is having on her. A pause is better than no pause, but the uncertainty is still really chaotic for a

03:09small business like me. And now, even if I move out of China, how am I going to be certain that if I

03:14place an order today, I won't find a new tariff tomorrow? This up and down is just something as a

03:18small business I can't pivot to. So that's Sarah Wells from Sarah Wells Bags. Well, what do you say to

03:23small business owners or even big business owners who say they're having difficulty making long-term

03:28business decisions because the country seems right now to be run by capricious whim?

03:33Oh, I don't think at all it's run by capricious whim. The way that I would think about it is that

03:38in the previous administration, you can sort of say, if you're thinking about it in the football

03:42analogy, is that they were running out the clock. And that what's going on now in the Trump

03:47administration is across a wide array of policy areas, we're in a two-minute offense. And the two-minute

03:52offense is pushing, as you've seen, the reconciliation bill through so that we get tax relief for

03:57American people, deregulation, and of course, trade policy. Now, on the trade policy, the whole point

04:03of the trade policy is to address the national emergency that we're too dependent on foreign

04:10products in the U.S., especially if we were at a time of conflict. And we're doing something about

04:15that. And the reciprocal act was basically, guys, if you come to the table and negotiate us with us

04:20and treat us the same way we treat you, then you'll get your rate really low. And so right now,

04:26130 countries, 130 countries have responded, and we're negotiating with them, and they've got

04:32their rate down to 10%. And so really, it's kind of almost a two-world system. There's a process

04:38about China, and that's very, very nascent, if at all, and then the process for everybody else. So

04:44the process for everybody else is orderly. It's clear. People are coming to town with great,

04:49great offers. We've got Japan, Korea, India. I was just talking to the foreign minister of India,

04:57and everything is moving forward very quickly. And so I guess that the bottom line is that the

05:03small business owner has experienced over the last few weeks the start of a process that's settling

05:08down really quite quickly. Again, 130 countries are at 10% now. So let's talk about these 130 countries,

05:13because as you know better than I do, it typically takes months, if not years, to negotiate trade

05:19deals. Trump's signature trade deal from his first term, a great achievement, according to both

05:25Democrats and Republicans, NAFTA II, or the USMCA, that took 15 months to put together. How exactly are

05:32you and your team and the USTR team, how are you going to negotiate deals that actually deliver for

05:38the American people with more than 100 countries in less than three months? Oh, yeah. You know,

05:44first of all, just a little bit of more clarification. One of the things I like to ask

05:49people is, who's the chairman of the National Economic Council? And then everybody thinks, oh,

05:52it's you, Kevin. Well, no, I'm the director. The chairman of the National Economic Council is

05:57President Trump. And so what President Trump does is he sets out a path for everybody, for Howard

06:03Lettnick, Scott Bessett, and for Jameson, on how they would move forward on a particular policy

06:08matter. And then it's my job as director to make sure that the president's wishes are being fulfilled.

06:12I'm kind of there to help everybody succeed. And I can tell you, I've been watching the people who

06:17are assigned to different assignments working really, really hard on getting trade deals forward

06:21over the last many weeks. And so one of the things that we were thinking about this week was that we

06:28had a few of these deals that are so close to baked that we could announce that we have a deal in

06:32principle. You're right that getting the fine print out would maybe take a little longer. But we were

06:37thinking about announcing a deal in principle even this week. But then we were making so much

06:41progress so rapidly that the president decided to instead, instead of having one or two things right

06:46now, just go for the 10 percent pause. And I think it was the right answer, given the massive amount of

06:51momentum that we've been seeing. Yeah. So let's talk about Lettnick and Jameson Greer, because last

06:57Sunday, the secretary of commerce, Howard Lettnick, was on a different show. He was talking about tariffs.

07:01And he was saying that these that what these are going to do is it's going to it's going to bring

07:06iPhone manufacturing to the United States. Five days ago, U.S. Trade Representative Jameson Greer

07:12told senators, quote, the president has been clear with me and with others that he does not intend to

07:17have exclusions and exemptions, unquote, to these tariffs. But now we know about these carve outs for

07:24electronics imported to the U.S. that we talked about, you talked about at the top, smartphones,

07:28computers, chips. It's it's a contradictory message. I mean, I understand that you're saying

07:34that this was the plan. But Lettnick, it seems like nobody told Lettnick and Greer.

07:40No, no, I disagree with that. I think that absolutely the characterization that I gave you

07:45at the top of the hour is the thing that everybody understood all along. But I can see that when you're

07:50getting interviewed here, interviewed there, that somehow like not having the time like you and I have

07:55now, just show the big picture, can make it so that people don't have a complete picture of what's

07:59going on. But Greer is in Senate testimony.

08:00Think about it this way. No, but but but think about this way again, that there are these 232s,

08:05which are coming, that are announced in the Reciprocal Trade Act. And the things that are going to be in

08:11the 232s, like the cannonballs that we need so that we can have something to put in the cannon,

08:15those things are in progress. And while those are in progress, these say 10 percent on most of the

08:22world tariffs will not apply to those things. And so then there's a question, an interpretation,

08:27what you say, OK, if you're not applying a semiconductor to those things, then what does

08:31that exactly mean? Because the U.S. doesn't really import a whole lot of just semiconductors.

08:36The semiconductors are in things. And it's very, very natural for the Commerce Department.

08:40And I think that the Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lettnick is one of the best Commerce Secretaries

08:44I've ever worked with, that he had his team go through and say, well, what does it mean to comply

08:50with this order? And that's what came out. I don't think that it was rushed or disorganized at all.

08:54So these exemptions are only for items that will help our Defense Department needs? It's not iPhones

09:01in general. It's not semiconductors in general for commercial use?

09:06There's a long list, which you could put a graphic up, of the things that we're planning 232 actions on

09:13because they're necessary for national security. And those things that are on that long list are

09:18things that will be exempt until those 232s happen. But you understand how some people might look at

09:24this and say, this doesn't really make sense in terms of the president's larger goal. If President

09:30Trump and you and your team are all trying to reshore manufacturing so that American manufacturing

09:36for phones and computers is happening here in the United States, and along with all these great

09:43middle class jobs that would go with it, that you're exempting those items, while at the same time,

09:50the reshoring and manufacturing of the production of sneakers and t-shirts would happen here.

09:57And that seems to be completely the opposite of the goal, right?

10:01That's just a perspective. If you think that we're going to fail to deliver on the 232s,

10:07then your question would be one to wonder about. But the 232s will be successful. We've already got

10:12232 steel and aluminum, for example, and so that wouldn't be covered by the reciprocal part.

10:19And we've got 232 on autos. That's not covered by the reciprocal part. So those other things are

10:24going to happen, and it makes a great deal of sense. So the one final thing I want to say is going

10:28back to, like, why are we doing this in the first place? There's the national security matter,

10:33but there's also what it means for the American worker. And so when we look at, say, the small

10:37business person who's concerned that the price of their goods is going to be higher when they sell

10:42it to their customers, the thing that they also have to remember is that these policies, which the

10:47president successfully enacted in the first term, are going to increase the demand for labor, increase

10:52wages, up by almost $6,500 in the first three years of the Trump administration. And so what it means is

10:57that even if you accept the naysayer's perspective on what might happen to the price of a cup of

11:02coffee, that the person walking into the coffee shop is going to have a lot more money. In the

11:0715 years after China entered the WTO, real wages went down. So wages went down by more than prices,

11:12as we thought these cheap goods were going to revolutionize America. In fact, it was the

11:15opposite. Welfare went down. We had Angus Deaton write a whole book about the deaths of despair that

11:20were related to this. And so I think we're very optimistic about the fact that people are going to have

11:24more money in their pockets and that they're going to have a higher standard of living.

11:28Well, right now, I mean, wealth has disappeared from the market. And as you know, the fears of a

11:32global recession or a United States recession have increased even among business supporters,

11:38business leaders who support President Trump.

11:41Well, what you're seeing is that the survey data is what we call the soft data. The survey data has

11:47been showing that people are anxious about the changes a little bit, but the hard data have been

11:52really, really strong. As you know, in fact, if you look at the latest jobs report, it was way,

11:56way above even what I expected. And so what's happening is that people are racing to create jobs

12:02and to make stuff here in the U.S. If they make it in the U.S., they're not going to pay any tariff.

12:06And there's an explosion in the labor market. It's really surprised me. And so you can't have a lot

12:11of new employment and then have like a recession. It's just, you know, the jobs, the jobs data was

12:17from before the liberation day. I mean, there's before all these global. Well, not, not all those,

12:24but, but, but also it was clear. I think that the jobs data were anticipation of something

12:29happening, something big. That would be only rational for firms to think that way. All right,

12:32Kevin Hassett, thank you so much for your time this morning. Really appreciate it.

12:35Jake.

Category

Transcript

Recommended