🚨 COMIENZA EL JUICIO POR EL DOBLE PARRICIDIO DE VICENTE LÓPEZ: HABLÓ EL ABOGADO DE NINA

HighlightNow

Martín del Río, sospechoso de haber matado a sus padres en Vicente López para ocultar un supuesto descalabro económico con la fortuna familiar, comienza hoy su juicio. Tras más de dos años desde el crimen que conmocionó al país, Del Río es el único imputado y enfrentará a la justicia en un proceso que promete ser tenso y lleno de sorpresas.

Transcript

00:00And attention, because the trial for one of the most appalling crimes in recent history, we can say, begins today.

00:07Martín del Río, and you have it. This man is suspected of having killed his parents, José Enrique del Río, 75 years old,

00:15and María Mercedes Alonso, 72, in a house in Vicente López, to supposedly hide the mismanagement,

00:22or the economic mess he had made with his family fortune.

00:26Fabián Rubino is here, working live from the San Isidro Courts. Fabián, how are you? Good morning.

00:32Hello, Guille, good morning. I'm sure you remember that fact, the shock it caused in all areas.

00:40Well, after more than two years, this oral trial comes, where Martín del Río is the only defendant,

00:47the only accused of killing this couple, actually, of killing their parents.

00:52He is in prison, totally isolated, he is not visited by any relative, by any friend,

00:58and this afternoon this trial will begin by a popular jury, Guillermo.

01:02Yes.

01:03There will be 12 people chosen at random, who will give a verdict, guilty or innocent,

01:09and whose duration will be around five days.

01:12It is believed that on Friday we can then have the sentence on this case.

01:16Exactly. Well, now let's go back to you, Fabi, but it must be said that among the testimonies

01:21that the prosecution provides will be that of Ninfa Aquino, the employee of the victims,

01:26who is the woman who discovers the lifeless bodies there in the garage.

01:30That's right, yes. Ninfa, or Nina, as they call her, was the woman of trust in the marriage of del Río,

01:37and who calls Martín del Río on the phone in a call that was recorded,

01:41they are part of the case where the man does not express any kind of surprise.

01:44No.

01:45She asked him, please come, and she was the accused.

01:48The homicide was arrested.

01:50For supposedly acting as a delivery woman.

01:52Of course, through the children, the children were also in the process,

01:55all a madness that Nina lived, which surely also had consequences in her health and in her economy.

02:01Today she presents herself as a witness, one of the first 50 witnesses

02:05who will be participating in this trial by jury.

02:09There will be 12, as Fabián said, jurors who will have to vote unanimously

02:13for the perpetual prison, which is what the lawsuit asks for, as a penalty for Martín del Río.

02:18Exactly. Dr. Hugo López Carribeiro, Carribero, sorry, is Nina Aquino's lawyer.

02:24There he is. How are you, doctor? How are you doing? Thank you for receiving us.

02:28Good morning. Nice to meet you and talk to you.

02:31Likewise, doctor. Let's remember that the first hypothesis pointed to his defendant,

02:36because during the first days there was a scene in the house,

02:41something like a scene similar to that there had been a robbery,

02:45and that Nina had been the delivery woman.

02:48Let's remember the fact a little bit.

02:51Yes, clearly, as you point out,

02:56it was established that the lady could have facilitated the entry

03:02to an undetermined number of criminals.

03:06Of which they had not been properly identified.

03:10So he was told, look, you are accused of facilitating the entry, as we say,

03:15to unknown criminals to commit this act,

03:20that is, the robbery and the double homicide of the del Río marriage.

03:28Nina remained in detention for 13 days,

03:31which was the time it took us to obtain her freedom.

03:36Before the prosecution and the trial of San Isidro.

03:39On the same day, September 8, when Nina was released in the morning,

03:45well, in the afternoon, Martín del Río was arrested, right?

03:49As the main accused, who is now on trial, as you just pointed out.

03:53Yes, doctor.

03:55So in this situation, well, yes.

03:57Now I want you to tell me when this unexpected twist occurs,

04:00but I remember that the family, in this case,

04:03does not go out to support him or defend him,

04:05but that the older brother himself, Diego del Río,

04:08when he sees the images, he says, he was my brother.

04:11What they wanted to install in Martín del Río's defense

04:15is that he had been the brother of the homicide.

04:17Of course.

04:18So it was a matter of cross-examination of accusations,

04:21without much provisional support, right, doctor?

04:26Of course, that's what happened.

04:28Of course, that's what happened.

04:29You are now projecting the video, right?

04:31Of that walker.

04:32Of the walker.

04:33Of course, that person who walks,

04:36well, was identified as precisely Martín del Río

04:40by the brother, by the sister-in-law, by the wife,

04:45and by Nina, and by Nina, right?

04:48And Nina not only said, yes, it is Martín del Río who walks,

04:52but also wears the father's bust.

04:55Because of the way he walks.

04:56Because of that bust.

04:57Sure.

04:58Sure, because of the way he walks.

04:59And that gray bust that he wears,

05:01I recognize that it is the father's,

05:03because I washed it and ironed it every day,

05:06Monday, for many years, right?

05:08So, that circumstance makes me presume

05:13that he was inside the house,

05:16that he changed clothes inside the house,

05:18and was the only person who could have committed this double crime.

05:21Yes, because let me add,

05:22the reconstruction of the municipality of Vicente López,

05:24the cameras, to decriminalize Nina,

05:27because through that walk,

05:29which he had already done days ago,

05:31with his lover at the time,

05:33he already had predetermined

05:35how the crime of his parents was going to be.

05:38So, practically, the crime, in some way,

05:42is resolved, at least today,

05:44in the instance prior to the trial,

05:46through the private cameras and the municipality.

05:48And that's where Nina is decriminalized.

05:50Sure.

05:51Yes.

05:52We must also take into account

05:53that the prosecution in this trial

05:55has a very important challenge, right?

05:57Because for Martín del Río

05:59to be sentenced to life imprisonment,

06:01it is necessary for the prosecution

06:03to pay unanimously

06:05to the members of the jury.

06:07Both have to agree.

06:09If there is one who does not agree,

06:11there could be another sentence,

06:13but not life imprisonment.

06:15Now, doctor, according to the prosecutors,

06:17I mean, the justice,

06:19the motive of this double murder was economic,

06:21and it has to do with the mismanagement

06:23of Martín del Río with part of the family fortune.

06:25What's more, he deceives his parents,

06:27he tells them to prepare for a move,

06:29when in reality it had been

06:31a frustrated real estate operation

06:33that never took place,

06:35which was from an apartment

06:37that he had supposedly bought

06:39for between $1.5 million and $2 million.

06:41He was going to move to the famous Chachano.

06:43Chando Libertador, today known

06:45as the cause of Wanda Nardi.

06:47Exactly. The one we see on the subject of Wanda,

06:49is that where he told his parents he was going to move?

06:51Yes, it is the building

06:53that is located in Libertador

06:55and Campo Salles.

06:57In the neighborhood of Núñez, right?

06:59Yes.

07:01Finally, this apartment was never bought.

07:03And the hypothesis, as you point out,

07:05the prosecutor's hypothesis

07:07is that he kills his parents

07:09to put an end to that suspicion.

07:11The parents had been claiming

07:13the move for a long time,

07:15based on the money they had given him.

07:17That's the prosecutor's hypothesis.

07:19Doctor,

07:21having so many conclusive evidence,

07:23why could any of the 12 members

07:25of the jury doubt

07:27that Del Rio was the murderer?

07:31Well, that's a good question

07:33to answer at the end of the trial.

07:35Right?

07:37In the event that

07:39you were acquitted, doctor?

07:41No, I mean

07:43that's a very

07:45reasonable concern,

07:47I would say

07:49why they could doubt.

07:51Well, I would wait for the end of the trial

07:53and if anyone doubts, I would say

07:55why they doubted.

07:57Right?

07:59Let's see, one can doubt

08:01because he can give

08:03the benefit of the doubt

08:05or because they give him money to doubt.

08:07Yes.

08:09Well, that's why I say

08:11that there is a challenge for the prosecution

08:13to maintain in a pure way

08:15without contaminating the prosecution,

08:17in this case,

08:19the members of the jury.

08:21In all seriousness,

08:23this procedure was chosen

08:25by the defendant, by Del Rio himself.

08:27He had the right to be judged

08:29by a court of judges

08:31or by the member,

08:33in this case,

08:35private members, right?

08:37A popular jury.

08:39What you point out can happen,

08:41yes, it can happen.

08:43It is not normal,

08:45it is not common,

08:47but the danger that you detail always exists.

08:49But when we are talking about a person

08:51with an important purchasing power,

08:53at least someone who is supporting him

08:55today, what we know is that he is housed

08:57in the penitentiary unit of San Martín,

08:59they feed his family once a week

09:01and he is a man who was somehow

09:03overwhelmed by debts

09:05because he bought high-end cars

09:07and did not pay them either.

09:09In that context, the man is practically

09:11alone, he has the defense,

09:13Dr. Chiribín, who has

09:15a patriarchy,

09:17this man with all the evidence

09:19against him, but let's say

09:21all the ways mark

09:23a sentence to life in prison.

09:25I think that also

09:27at this time, when it is 10 and 20

09:29in the morning, the selection

09:31of the jury

09:33is taking place.

09:35Well,

09:37this is something very important

09:39because the prosecution

09:41is going to establish jurors

09:43in his favor and the defense

09:45in his favor, right?

09:49I would say that at this

09:51precise moment,

09:53the most important

09:55legal act of the trial

09:57is the selection of the jury.

09:59Doctor, finally, because you are

10:01defending Nina, Ninfa Aquino,

10:03who was the trusted employee

10:05and who really had a bad time

10:07at the time, for almost two weeks

10:09she was in the eye of the storm

10:11and everyone thought she had opened the door,

10:13she had been the deliverer.

10:17She is going to start a lawsuit

10:19against Del Rio?

10:23Yes, it will be the corresponding

10:25lawsuit for damages and perjuries.

10:27It has not yet been presented,

10:29although it is prepared,

10:31but it has not been presented because

10:33we are waiting for the result of this trial

10:35to add a copy of the sentence.

10:39Well, doctor,

10:41thank you very much for this contribution

10:43and of course we are going to follow

10:45the consecution of the substance of the trial

10:47to see what happens.

10:49When should it be defined

10:51if it is guilty or is it absolved?

10:53Look, throughout this week

10:55the five days of the trial are scheduled.

10:57After the end of the trial,

10:59on Friday,

11:01usually the jury takes three days

11:03to resolve, so next week

11:05we would already have the result.

11:07Well, we will be talking if you allow us.

11:09Doctor, thank you very much.

11:11Well, I greet you with all my appreciation.

11:13Likewise, see you later.

11:15Well, let's wait a few days to see what happens.

Category

Transcript

Recommended