Why PTI object to the Chief Justice of Pakistan ??? Salman Akram Raja Reveals | Breaking News - video Dailymotion

ARY NEWS

#constitutionalcourt #supremecourt #judicialreforms #qazifeazisa #chiefjustice #pti #reservedseats #sunniittehadcouncil #kashifabbasi #pmlngovernment #breakingnews #offtherecord #cjpqazifaezisa   Why PTI object to the Chief Justice of Pakistan ??? Salman Akram Raja Reveals | Breaking News

Transcript

00:00What is happening? Today there was a case in the Supreme Court in which Tariq-e-Insaaf was also present.

00:09Let's talk to the Secretary General of Tariq-e-Insaaf, Salman Akram Rajasah.

00:13We recorded a short while ago with him. He will tell you.

00:16Salman sir, tell us, today there was an objection in the court.

00:21Chief Justice of Pakistan, that was your case today.

00:25There was an objection that he should not sit on the bench.

00:27Is this your position as an official of Tariq-e-Insaaf that he should not listen to your case?

00:31Yes, this is our position.

00:32But we have never heard this before.

00:34I mean, there was no objection before.

00:36To what extent are you now making it a strict position that,

00:39because in every case, do you also feel that every case,

00:43from which the coming politics will be affected,

00:45whether it is the case of 63A or other cases,

00:47should he be a part of the benches?

00:49Look, our position as a party now is that he should not be.

00:53Whether it is the case of 63A or the cases of recounting,

00:57in all of these, the attitude that is coming forward,

01:01is that we are suffering losses everywhere.

01:04But it is not enough to only suffer losses.

01:07An objection was made to a judge, a rebuttal was made,

01:10other decisions were made.

01:12Many of our petitions that are read,

01:14in relation to the 2024 elections,

01:17in relation to 8th February, they are not being heard, etc.

01:20Even today, the case of the election tribunal,

01:23look, the election commission got what it wanted.

01:26The judges appointed by Shahzad Ahmed Khan as the Chief Justice,

01:31those judges were removed through a re-consultation process,

01:35by the new Chief Justice.

01:39So, there are four judges,

01:41who were appointed by Shahzad Ahmed Khan as the election tribunal.

01:45The election commission objected to them.

01:47Today, the judges who objected to them,

01:50there was no justification.

01:52When we went to the High Court,

01:54we said, what is your objection?

01:56Give us a justification.

01:58They did not have any justification.

02:00But anyway, those judges will not work as election tribunals in Punjab.

02:04So, we are very worried.

02:05But today, I saw the Islamabad High Court,

02:07I also saw the Supreme Court.

02:09The judges are saying, why are the judges of the High Court in the tribunal?

02:12I was looking at Mr. Golasan Aurangzeb,

02:15he said, if I get married, I will have a headache.

02:18See, this was in the law.

02:20The law of 2017,

02:22section 140, sub-section 3,

02:26says, serving judges of the High Court shall be election tribunals.

02:31And this is why, after a lot of deliberation,

02:34the judges who come,

02:36on the contract,

02:38the retired judge,

02:39he will be appointed for a month.

02:42He will be appointed for 5 years.

02:44Until the assembly is over,

02:46they do not let the case end.

02:48This is our experience.

02:49Plus, they are absolutely compliant.

02:52Because it was also written in the law,

02:54that you can take a case from a judge and give it to someone else,

02:56you can also dismiss him.

02:58The retired judge you have appointed,

03:01he is compliant with you.

03:03If he does not listen to you,

03:05you will take a case from him and give it to someone else.

03:07He will be dismissed.

03:08You will abrogate his contract.

03:10This is a strange system.

03:12You say that there was fraud in the election,

03:15so prove it.

03:16Prove it in front of whom?

03:17Prove it in front of your employees, judges.

03:20Our case is against the Election Commission,

03:22against R.O. Saiman.

03:24So how can we prove that case,

03:26in front of the judges,

03:28who are employed by them?

03:30This will also go to court.

03:32But all these things take time.

03:34And they want,

03:35who have come on the basis of Form 47,

03:38that we sit and continue the case.

03:40Do you think the courts are making political decisions?

03:42I don't want to take anyone's name.

03:44I remember People's Party and Iftikhar Chaudhary.

03:47It was said that Iftikhar Chaudhary has become a politician.

03:50Do you think this is politics?

03:52Look, to some extent,

03:54every judge has a political background,

03:57a political, you can say,

03:59downfall.

04:01But I don't think that politically,

04:03political decisions are made.

04:05Except that,

04:07you have a background of grudge.

04:10Do you have a background of grudge today?

04:12Look, we have filed this.

04:14What reference are you sending against people?

04:16Let me tell you.

04:17Look, earlier we didn't have,

04:19at least I didn't have these materials,

04:21which we tried to present.

04:23So there is a personal nature to it.

04:25When this reference was made,

04:27the letters that were written at that time,

04:29the open letters,

04:30the statements that were given at that time,

04:32there were very specific statements,

04:34in reference to Imran Khan's personality,

04:36in reference to the PTI,

04:38in reference to the conversations

04:40that took place in the state of Madinah at that time,

04:42that was made fun of.

04:44So all of this is such a background,

04:46which is extraordinary.

04:48Usually, it doesn't happen that a judge

04:50and a team have such a background.

04:52So it is.

04:54And that is why we raised the objection,

04:56and we will continue to do so.

Why PTI object to the Chief Justice of Pakistan ??? Salman Akram Raja Reveals | Breaking News

Category

Transcript

Recommended