Kiya Hukumat Supreme Court Kay Faislay Par Amal Karay Gi? Expert Analysis

ARY NEWS

#reservedseats #supremecourt #adhoc #breakingnews #11thhour #pti #imrankhan #sunniittehadcouncil   Kiya Hukumat Supreme Court Kay Faislay Par Amal Karay Gi? Expert Analysis

Transcript

00:00Mr. Fnaan, please tell us, the matter started with the special sessions.

00:05What is your personal opinion?

00:08The Supreme Court of Pakistan has already given its verdict on this matter.

00:11And they say that there is an increase in the number of requests.

00:14But still, if we talk on principle,

00:16do you think that the PTI should get the sessions or not?

00:24In the name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.

00:26Look, the thing is that,

00:29the politicians and the institutions have the responsibility to act on the law.

00:37But the Supreme Court of Pakistan has the biggest responsibility.

00:42Both the interpretation and the practice.

00:44The verdict that has been given,

00:46yes, both the interpretation and the practice,

00:48but the verdict that has been given,

00:50there are some things in it that are contrary to the Election Act 2017.

00:57And it is also contrary to the law.

01:00Now, until the detailed judgment comes,

01:03it can be seen and told what evidence the judges have taken.

01:09Because in the law, it is written that you will have 3 days,

01:13there they have given 15 days.

01:15Then there are other matters that the lists were not filled.

01:19If there is a party that has not contested the election,

01:22how will the list be filled?

01:24But they are covering it under an umbrella of absolute justice.

01:31No, but look,

01:33it means that the law is nothing,

01:36you are ending the legislature.

01:38Of course, Mr. Azad can give a better opinion on this,

01:42but my understanding in this,

01:44which we have seen while talking,

01:47you have mentioned the Election Act 2017.

01:51The constitution of Pakistan has always had authority

01:55and superiority over any act.

01:58Number one.

01:59The second thing is that when we talk about the interpretation of the constitution

02:03and the decisions of the Supreme Court,

02:05and here we are talking about the decision of the full court,

02:09in that, the decisions are also,

02:11in a way, the courts are also there

02:13and in a way, they have the power of law.

02:15This is in your knowledge.

02:17Do you disagree with that?

02:19Look, the constitution has precedence over the act,

02:23there is no doubt about that.

02:25But judges cannot make the law.

02:27They can interpret it,

02:29they can explain it,

02:31but they cannot make the law.

02:33Otherwise, you can end the legislature.

02:35It is written in the constitution

02:37that the work of the legislature

02:39is of the politicians.

02:41Similarly, the work of the court

02:43is to make the decision,

02:45to interpret the constitution,

02:47it is the work of the legislature.

02:49So, if it is like this,

02:51then it will be like the first decision of 63A

02:53and it was said that

02:55the head of the party is disqualified

02:57because Mr. Nawaz Sharif was the head of the party

02:59and then later it was said

03:01that the parliamentary leader will run

03:03when the matter happened in Punjab.

03:05So, there is a problem of such decisions

03:07because if you do not make the law and constitution

03:11then you will have to face the consequences.

03:13Before moving forward,

03:15I would like to understand

03:17that you are saying that

03:19the PTI sessions should not have been held.

03:21I think that

03:23the decision that has been made

03:25is not in accordance with the law.

03:27If they give such an explanation

03:29in the detailed judgment,

03:31then I will look into it.

03:33But I have read it many times

03:35in the short order.

03:37I did not understand any reason

03:39and I did not understand

03:41how it was interpreted

03:43and how the election act was done.

03:45There is no request.

03:47They have not asked for anything

03:49and they have given it to them.

03:51So, all these things

03:53will have to be looked into

03:55and we have gone to the review

03:57and we hope that

03:59there will be more clarity on this

04:01from the court.

04:03Let's hope so.

04:05Mr. Riyasat Ali Azad,

04:08Mr. Satti,

04:10can you hear me?

04:12Yes, yes, I can hear you.

04:14I can hear you all.

04:16Hello?

04:18We will try to connect you again.

04:20Mr. Azad,

04:22let me ask you a question.

04:24We are talking about the sessions.

04:26What is the viewpoint

04:28of the People's Party on this matter?

04:30The Supreme Court of Pakistan

04:32has already made a decision regarding this.

04:34We often say that

04:36it was the Supreme Court's decision.

04:38Is there any objection to this

04:40from Noorli's side?

04:44Look,

04:46I think that

04:48even after talking

04:50to the court,

04:52the court

04:54thinks that

04:56our decisions

04:58should not be discussed

05:00and many people

05:02received notices

05:04Look,

05:06the way you were talking

05:08and the way I was listening

05:10and trying to understand

05:12I think the Senator

05:14was saying

05:16that the

05:18Jamaat that has asked for seats

05:20the majority

05:22of which

05:24is in that house

05:26how many are there?

05:28So, on that basis

05:30all these things

05:32kept happening

05:34and the punishment

05:36that is not done by the court

05:38how can the court

05:40give relief on that?

05:42So,

05:44there are some intricacies

05:46that should not be there

05:48and then the decisions

05:50if it is said

05:52that the law

05:54that the legislators have made

05:56that law is contrary

05:58to the law

06:00then

06:02there is a need

06:04to see

06:06if the decisions

06:08are contrary to the law

06:10No, so

06:12Mr. Hassan,

06:14this is a very interesting statement

06:16but the thing is

06:18only one institution has the right

06:20to interpret the law

06:22and that is the Supreme Court of Pakistan

06:24So, who will decide

06:26if it is contrary or not?

06:29You are absolutely right

06:31and it is the authority

06:33of the Supreme Court

06:35to interpret the law

06:37there is no doubt about it

06:39but that interpretation

06:41it looks like

06:43that the interpretation is correct

06:45according to the law

06:47if any party has a disagreement

06:49then

06:51it can be reviewed

06:53so I think

06:55the government is going for a review

06:57Yes, they have gone for a review

06:59We have also talked about Imtana

07:01I think they are yet to decide

Category

Transcript

Recommended