Will government Filed Review Petition on Reserved Seats Judgement | Hasnaat Malik's give Inside news
#imrankhan #pti #shehbazsharif #breakingnews #reservedseats #iddatcase #bushrabibi #adialajail #sunniittehadcouncil #supremecourt #qazifeazisa
Will government Filed Review Petition on Reserved Seats Judgement | Hasnaat Malik's give Inside news
Will government Filed Review Petition on Reserved Seats Judgement | Hasnaat Malik's give Inside news
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Today I was listening to Attorney General of Pakistan, he said that the review will not be able to decide the decision that has come tomorrow.
00:08But from his words, I felt that he would not advise the government to go for a review in this case.
00:14He said that we should go for a review with a clear mind for tomorrow's decision.
00:18See, first of all, the government must have taken this matter so seriously.
00:24But they did not make the full effort in this case.
00:29Obviously, they saw that the Chief Justice of Pakistan, Qazi Fahisa,
00:33because she had a consistent position that her text is very clear,
00:36and the seats that have been given to the People's Party, Noon League, and the ruling parties are fine.
00:41So, they thought that the Chief Justice of Pakistan, Qazi Fahisa, will be with them.
00:48And will convince them.
00:49Yes, will convince them.
00:50It is their job to convince them.
00:51See, Dr. Feroz Naseem was the lawyer of MQO, he did not present himself in this case.
00:57Farooqa Inayak did not make an argument.
01:00She adopted someone's argument.
01:03Noon League's lawyer, Makhdoom Ali Khan's lawyer, adopted the argument.
01:08And JOI did an election commission.
01:11So, it felt that the government…
01:14Like this is the case of Chief Justice Qazi Fahisa.
01:16And Chief Justice Qazi Fahisa, obviously, felt that she was overconfident.
01:21She thought that the majority was with her.
01:24When in the end, she realized that the majority was on the other side.
01:28Then, when Jamal Mandukheel's note came, when it was presented,
01:32there, in that, and the one that Qazi Fahisa also endorsed,
01:36in that, and the majority judge's judgment, there is only one difference.
01:42The difference is that both are agreeing that PTI should get the seats.
01:45PTI is a parliamentary party.
01:47The election commission interpreted it wrongly.
01:49But how many should get the seats?
01:51There is a disagreement on this.
01:52Now, the two judges, Chief Justice Qazi Fahisa and Chief Justice Jamal Mandukheel,
01:56they say that the election commission should look at it,
01:58look at the nomination papers, the return candidates,
02:01how many of them expressed their relations with PTI,
02:04they should be included in PTI, and according to them, the seats should be given.
02:09In fact, the other majority judges,
02:11they say that due to the decision of the election commission,
02:13all the corruption was created,
02:16due to that, they should get a second chance,
02:18the people who went to the Constitutional Council,
02:20they should go to PTI.
02:21So, the difference was that how many seats should be given,
02:24there is a difference on this.
02:25Now, this allegation and this propaganda that the Constitution has been rewritten,
02:29if we look at it, Chief Justice Qazi Fahisa has also said that PTI is a parliamentary party,
02:33and it has been said that PTI should also be given reserve seats.
02:35The difference between them is how many seats should be given,
02:38and the implication of how many seats are there,
02:41that if those seats, I think two-thirds of the majority,
02:46that was in the mind of the judges.
02:48Because this is a very important matter,
02:50and the government has propagated again and again that we are bringing a judicial package,
02:53and this will happen and that will happen.
02:55So, I think the message that the judges gave was that no more constitutional amendment.
02:59At least, they have tried to do it in terms of judiciary.
03:02So, the review will be complete,
03:06and it does not seem that this decision will be made.
03:08But the judges will hear this review.
03:10And they have made it very clear.
03:13And now the government and relevant quarters will have to see
03:17whether they will want confrontation with the future Chief Justice.
03:21Because if they want,
03:24the next Chief Justice will be Pakistan for the next three years.
03:29And Qazi's chances seem to be less now.
03:32He himself says that he does not want to take an extension.
03:36But if every judge's tenure increased by three years,
03:39then maybe he would have been called.
03:42The government wants him to stay.
03:44So, now if Chief Justice Mansoor Ali Shah wants to be the Chief Justice in the future,
03:50then I think the government will try not to confront him.
03:54Because the rigging petition is pending.
03:57And there are many other issues.
03:59And when the details of the election commission will come,
04:02a lot can be written in it.
04:04So, I think these things will be in the government's mind
04:07so that we do not give such a message
04:09that will cause more confrontation.
04:12Apart from the election commission,
04:14the rigging tribunals are pending.
04:1613 judges have said that their conduct was unfair
04:20before 8th February.
04:22To take signatures from that party and not to accept them as a party.
04:26So, in the future, it will be even more difficult.
04:30If the tribunals have an induction on the recommendations of the same election commission,
04:34whether we talk about Lahore or the future cases,
04:37then what is the complication in that?
04:39There are a lot of complications.
04:41If the election commission feels a little,
04:43then this is a charge sheet against them.
04:45And the reasoning that will come,
04:47that reasoning will be focused on the election commission.
04:50What has the election commission done?
04:52That a decision of the Supreme Court comes,
04:54the election commission itself makes a whole party dysfunctional.
04:57And that too, 4-6 days before the election.
05:01So, this was a big surprise.
05:03Yesterday, from the election commission,
05:05news were coming from sources.
05:09And surprisingly,
05:11the election commission is adamant.
05:13Against whom?
05:1413 judges of the Supreme Court.
05:16This was quite surprising.
05:18Then the election commission,
05:20whether you see it before 8th February or after 8th February,
05:23whether it is the decision of the election commission tribunal,
05:26the failure of the EMS system,
05:30the failure of their presiding officers,
05:32the failure of their returning officers,
05:34the system that they had to send results on 8th February,
05:38they are not ready to accept any failure of any election act of 2017.
05:45There is no inquiry, there is no investigation,
05:47there is nothing.
05:48Now, what the Supreme Court has seen,
05:50that you have made such a big negligence,
05:52that you have made a political party completely dysfunctional.
05:55And even today, the election commission is adamant.
05:57I think,
05:58there will be good things in the reasoning about the election commission.
06:01And the election commission will have to answer them.
06:03And in the coming days,
06:04the PTI is also claiming that we are taking reference against them.
06:08So, the election commission,
06:09from the elections of 8th February,
06:11till date,
06:12they have not said a single word,
06:13that we have made a negligence from somewhere,
06:15or there should be an inquiry.
06:16No, no, we are saying,
06:17we are fine,
06:18we have interpreted everything correctly.
06:19Quickly, the last question to you,
06:21this implementation,
06:22for 15 days,
06:23in 15 days,
06:24in the implementation of this judgment,
06:26don't you feel that
06:27there will be obstacles?
06:28I am using the word obstacles.
06:30But, it will be very difficult.
06:31These are not the judges,
06:33who used to follow Umar Atta Bandiyar's judgment in the past.
06:37These judges,
06:39for the implementation of their order,
06:41will go far ahead.
06:43And,
06:44we have to see,
06:45if Chief Justice Qazi Faiz,
06:47it is not possible,
06:48that the majority judgment,
06:49will not be followed.
06:52This is a judgment of the whole institution.
06:54So, it is not like that.
06:55And,
06:56it seems that yesterday,
06:57it was shocking for everyone.
06:58So, when,
06:59in a day or two,
07:00with a calm attitude,
07:01things will be seen,
07:02with peace,
07:03then it will be seen,
07:04that the present government,
07:05has no problem with this judgment.
07:06Why not?
07:07Their sessions went on.
07:08Such a big issue.
07:09No, no,
07:10the government will go on.
07:11The problem is that,
07:12the system will go on.
07:13The main thing is that,
07:14the system should go on.
07:15Okay.
07:16There will not be a constitution amendment.
07:17And, there is a judicial package.
07:18And, there is a message of judges.
07:19Now, the government should understand,
07:20that the government,
07:21why these judges,
07:22they did not,
07:23two-thirds,
07:24no,
07:25because the reason was,
07:26that the kind of statements,
07:27of Mr. Lahmishter,
07:28and many other people,
07:29it seemed that,
07:30the judges do not want,
07:31such a judicial package,
07:32in which,
07:33there were many other things.
07:34There were many other things,
07:35other than the extension,
07:36of the tenor of the judges.
07:37But, how will the next chief justice,
07:38be elected,
07:39among them,
07:40how will anything be done?
07:41Yes,
07:42these were the things,
07:43which I think,
07:44were done in a wrong way.
07:45And,
07:46which,
07:47see,
07:48in this,
07:49if the opinion of two judges,
07:50is not endorsed,
07:51like Jamal's,
07:52then,
07:53the reason for that was,
07:54so that,
07:55two-thirds,
07:56of the judges,
07:57were not,
07:58so that,
07:59two-thirds,
08:00of the judges,
08:01were not,
08:02so that,
08:03two-thirds,
08:04of the judges,
08:05were not,
08:06so that,
08:07two-thirds,
08:08of the judges,
08:09were not,
08:10so that,
08:11two-thirds,
08:12of the judges,
08:13were not,
08:14so that,
08:15two-thirds,
08:16of the judges,
08:17were not,
08:18so that,
08:19two-thirds,
08:20of the judges,
08:21were not,
08:22so that,
08:23two-thirds,
08:24of the judges,