Will government Filed Review Petition on Reserved Seats Judgement | Hasnaat Malik's give Inside news - video Dailymotion

ARY NEWS

#imrankhan  #pti #shehbazsharif #breakingnews #reservedseats #iddatcase #bushrabibi #adialajail #sunniittehadcouncil #supremecourt #qazifeazisa   Will government Filed Review Petition on Reserved Seats Judgement | Hasnaat Malik's give Inside news

Transcript

00:00Today I was listening to Attorney General of Pakistan, he said that the review will not be able to decide the decision that has come tomorrow.

00:08But from his words, I felt that he would not advise the government to go for a review in this case.

00:14He said that we should go for a review with a clear mind for tomorrow's decision.

00:18See, first of all, the government must have taken this matter so seriously.

00:24But they did not make the full effort in this case.

00:29Obviously, they saw that the Chief Justice of Pakistan, Qazi Fahisa,

00:33because she had a consistent position that her text is very clear,

00:36and the seats that have been given to the People's Party, Noon League, and the ruling parties are fine.

00:41So, they thought that the Chief Justice of Pakistan, Qazi Fahisa, will be with them.

00:48And will convince them.

00:49Yes, will convince them.

00:50It is their job to convince them.

00:51See, Dr. Feroz Naseem was the lawyer of MQO, he did not present himself in this case.

00:57Farooqa Inayak did not make an argument.

01:00She adopted someone's argument.

01:03Noon League's lawyer, Makhdoom Ali Khan's lawyer, adopted the argument.

01:08And JOI did an election commission.

01:11So, it felt that the government…

01:14Like this is the case of Chief Justice Qazi Fahisa.

01:16And Chief Justice Qazi Fahisa, obviously, felt that she was overconfident.

01:21She thought that the majority was with her.

01:24When in the end, she realized that the majority was on the other side.

01:28Then, when Jamal Mandukheel's note came, when it was presented,

01:32there, in that, and the one that Qazi Fahisa also endorsed,

01:36in that, and the majority judge's judgment, there is only one difference.

01:42The difference is that both are agreeing that PTI should get the seats.

01:45PTI is a parliamentary party.

01:47The election commission interpreted it wrongly.

01:49But how many should get the seats?

01:51There is a disagreement on this.

01:52Now, the two judges, Chief Justice Qazi Fahisa and Chief Justice Jamal Mandukheel,

01:56they say that the election commission should look at it,

01:58look at the nomination papers, the return candidates,

02:01how many of them expressed their relations with PTI,

02:04they should be included in PTI, and according to them, the seats should be given.

02:09In fact, the other majority judges,

02:11they say that due to the decision of the election commission,

02:13all the corruption was created,

02:16due to that, they should get a second chance,

02:18the people who went to the Constitutional Council,

02:20they should go to PTI.

02:21So, the difference was that how many seats should be given,

02:24there is a difference on this.

02:25Now, this allegation and this propaganda that the Constitution has been rewritten,

02:29if we look at it, Chief Justice Qazi Fahisa has also said that PTI is a parliamentary party,

02:33and it has been said that PTI should also be given reserve seats.

02:35The difference between them is how many seats should be given,

02:38and the implication of how many seats are there,

02:41that if those seats, I think two-thirds of the majority,

02:46that was in the mind of the judges.

02:48Because this is a very important matter,

02:50and the government has propagated again and again that we are bringing a judicial package,

02:53and this will happen and that will happen.

02:55So, I think the message that the judges gave was that no more constitutional amendment.

02:59At least, they have tried to do it in terms of judiciary.

03:02So, the review will be complete,

03:06and it does not seem that this decision will be made.

03:08But the judges will hear this review.

03:10And they have made it very clear.

03:13And now the government and relevant quarters will have to see

03:17whether they will want confrontation with the future Chief Justice.

03:21Because if they want,

03:24the next Chief Justice will be Pakistan for the next three years.

03:29And Qazi's chances seem to be less now.

03:32He himself says that he does not want to take an extension.

03:36But if every judge's tenure increased by three years,

03:39then maybe he would have been called.

03:42The government wants him to stay.

03:44So, now if Chief Justice Mansoor Ali Shah wants to be the Chief Justice in the future,

03:50then I think the government will try not to confront him.

03:54Because the rigging petition is pending.

03:57And there are many other issues.

03:59And when the details of the election commission will come,

04:02a lot can be written in it.

04:04So, I think these things will be in the government's mind

04:07so that we do not give such a message

04:09that will cause more confrontation.

04:12Apart from the election commission,

04:14the rigging tribunals are pending.

04:1613 judges have said that their conduct was unfair

04:20before 8th February.

04:22To take signatures from that party and not to accept them as a party.

04:26So, in the future, it will be even more difficult.

04:30If the tribunals have an induction on the recommendations of the same election commission,

04:34whether we talk about Lahore or the future cases,

04:37then what is the complication in that?

04:39There are a lot of complications.

04:41If the election commission feels a little,

04:43then this is a charge sheet against them.

04:45And the reasoning that will come,

04:47that reasoning will be focused on the election commission.

04:50What has the election commission done?

04:52That a decision of the Supreme Court comes,

04:54the election commission itself makes a whole party dysfunctional.

04:57And that too, 4-6 days before the election.

05:01So, this was a big surprise.

05:03Yesterday, from the election commission,

05:05news were coming from sources.

05:09And surprisingly,

05:11the election commission is adamant.

05:13Against whom?

05:1413 judges of the Supreme Court.

05:16This was quite surprising.

05:18Then the election commission,

05:20whether you see it before 8th February or after 8th February,

05:23whether it is the decision of the election commission tribunal,

05:26the failure of the EMS system,

05:30the failure of their presiding officers,

05:32the failure of their returning officers,

05:34the system that they had to send results on 8th February,

05:38they are not ready to accept any failure of any election act of 2017.

05:45There is no inquiry, there is no investigation,

05:47there is nothing.

05:48Now, what the Supreme Court has seen,

05:50that you have made such a big negligence,

05:52that you have made a political party completely dysfunctional.

05:55And even today, the election commission is adamant.

05:57I think,

05:58there will be good things in the reasoning about the election commission.

06:01And the election commission will have to answer them.

06:03And in the coming days,

06:04the PTI is also claiming that we are taking reference against them.

06:08So, the election commission,

06:09from the elections of 8th February,

06:11till date,

06:12they have not said a single word,

06:13that we have made a negligence from somewhere,

06:15or there should be an inquiry.

06:16No, no, we are saying,

06:17we are fine,

06:18we have interpreted everything correctly.

06:19Quickly, the last question to you,

06:21this implementation,

06:22for 15 days,

06:23in 15 days,

06:24in the implementation of this judgment,

06:26don't you feel that

06:27there will be obstacles?

06:28I am using the word obstacles.

06:30But, it will be very difficult.

06:31These are not the judges,

06:33who used to follow Umar Atta Bandiyar's judgment in the past.

06:37These judges,

06:39for the implementation of their order,

06:41will go far ahead.

06:43And,

06:44we have to see,

06:45if Chief Justice Qazi Faiz,

06:47it is not possible,

06:48that the majority judgment,

06:49will not be followed.

06:52This is a judgment of the whole institution.

06:54So, it is not like that.

06:55And,

06:56it seems that yesterday,

06:57it was shocking for everyone.

06:58So, when,

06:59in a day or two,

07:00with a calm attitude,

07:01things will be seen,

07:02with peace,

07:03then it will be seen,

07:04that the present government,

07:05has no problem with this judgment.

07:06Why not?

07:07Their sessions went on.

07:08Such a big issue.

07:09No, no,

07:10the government will go on.

07:11The problem is that,

07:12the system will go on.

07:13The main thing is that,

07:14the system should go on.

07:15Okay.

07:16There will not be a constitution amendment.

07:17And, there is a judicial package.

07:18And, there is a message of judges.

07:19Now, the government should understand,

07:20that the government,

07:21why these judges,

07:22they did not,

07:23two-thirds,

07:24no,

07:25because the reason was,

07:26that the kind of statements,

07:27of Mr. Lahmishter,

07:28and many other people,

07:29it seemed that,

07:30the judges do not want,

07:31such a judicial package,

07:32in which,

07:33there were many other things.

07:34There were many other things,

07:35other than the extension,

07:36of the tenor of the judges.

07:37But, how will the next chief justice,

07:38be elected,

07:39among them,

07:40how will anything be done?

07:41Yes,

07:42these were the things,

07:43which I think,

07:44were done in a wrong way.

07:45And,

07:46which,

07:47see,

07:48in this,

07:49if the opinion of two judges,

07:50is not endorsed,

07:51like Jamal's,

07:52then,

07:53the reason for that was,

07:54so that,

07:55two-thirds,

07:56of the judges,

07:57were not,

07:58so that,

07:59two-thirds,

08:00of the judges,

08:01were not,

08:02so that,

08:03two-thirds,

08:04of the judges,

08:05were not,

08:06so that,

08:07two-thirds,

08:08of the judges,

08:09were not,

08:10so that,

08:11two-thirds,

08:12of the judges,

08:13were not,

08:14so that,

08:15two-thirds,

08:16of the judges,

08:17were not,

08:18so that,

08:19two-thirds,

08:20of the judges,

08:21were not,

08:22so that,

08:23two-thirds,

08:24of the judges,

Will government Filed Review Petition on Reserved Seats Judgement | Hasnaat Malik's give Inside news

Category

Transcript

Recommended