PTI Chief, Shah Mehmood Qureshi acquitted in cipher case - Barrister Salman Safdar Told Everything

  • 3 months ago
#Khabar#ImranKhan #ShahMehmoodQureshi #CipherCase #IslamabadHighCourt #SalmanSafdar

Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY

Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP

ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.

Official Facebook: https://www.fb.com/arynewsasia

Official Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/arynewsofficial

Official Instagram: https://instagram.com/arynewstv

Website: https://arynews.tv

Watch ARY NEWS LIVE: http://live.arynews.tv

Listen Live: http://live.arynews.tv/audio

Listen Top of the hour Headlines, Bulletins & Programs: https://soundcloud.com/arynewsofficial
#ARYNews

ARY News Official YouTube Channel.
For more videos, subscribe to our channel and for suggestions please use the comment section.
Transcript
00:00 Congratulations, you fought a long case and today we saw a complete acquittal.
00:07 The acquittal order has arrived, Salman.
00:09 We were expecting a go-ahead remand back.
00:12 We are really blessed because initially I didn't think that it would take us so long
00:23 to convince the honourable judges that this is a case of acquittal.
00:27 During this time, there was a lot of turbulence.
00:30 Many times, there was talk of remand, many times there was talk of additional evidence.
00:35 But in this case, our wisdom was that the most important case of Cipher is being closed.
00:42 So, we will go on its merits.
00:45 We will not start the bail in this case.
00:48 Especially when bail is not even seen in other cases or when it is released.
00:53 But finally, after three months of long arguments and I think 40 hours in Islamabad High Court,
00:59 we read extensively and comprehensively and to our hearts' content.
01:03 We and the government also got a chance to defend our judgement in this case.
01:10 In which finally, it was a failure.
01:13 And after that failure, Imran Khan and Shah Mehmood Qureshi
01:17 didn't release them while giving the benefit of doubt.
01:20 This acquittal is a failure of the prosecution to justify starting prosecution under the Official Secrets Act.
01:30 The Official Secrets Act is a very serious crime.
01:34 It is a crime of treason.
01:39 These are anti-state activities.
01:41 And today, after this acquittal, it has been revealed that neither Imran Khan is a traitor,
01:48 nor Shah Mehmood Qureshi, nor has he given any benefit to the enemy country,
01:52 nor has he given any secret of Pakistan.
01:55 But our main ground, I will tell you, the ace ground which has taken this case to acquittal,
02:03 that on which case, on which document the entire case was revolving, the cipher,
02:09 the government did not show that document to the judges, nor did it present it in the court, nor was it exhibited.
02:14 So the judges kept thinking that there is a cipher document, something can be done in it.
02:19 I will get to that, Barrister sahib, I will get to that.
02:21 But please tell us that there were three portions of this charge which were framed on Imran Khan and Shah Mehmood Qureshi.
02:27 The first portion was unlawful retention and negligent handling.
02:31 The second portion of this charge was disclosure to unauthorized persons.
02:35 And the third was what benefit or benefit has been given to foreign powers.
02:39 The third was not a direct or indirect evidence that a third party or a country has benefited.
02:45 But the cipher and the misrepresentation of Wazir Azam Imran Khan,
02:49 this is a punishment for two years.
02:51 These were admitted things, they were not denied.
02:53 The PM himself believed that the cipher came and it could not be returned.
02:57 Look, the most important character in this was that of Azam Khan sahib who was the principal secretary.
03:04 He was the recipient, the guardian, custodian, the receiver and it was his prime responsibility to return it to the foreign office.
03:12 So the most important point was that the person whom you gave the cipher,
03:18 you made him the first accused and then suddenly he was kidnapped, he disappeared,
03:23 an FIR was filed and then he came to the public and became a government witness.
03:29 And when he became a government witness, his statement was something else.
03:34 When he came to court, he accused Imran Khan sahib of being a criminal.
03:38 So the entire case of the government was based on the statement of co-accused,
03:43 the statement of accomplice, which is inherently a weak evidence.
03:49 And it is said that it is likened to the Sultan's witness,
03:54 who is likened to Girgit, that it should be relied on with great care and understanding.
04:00 So the witness who was his accomplice, that witness did not prove anything and it was his responsibility.
04:09 So on one hand you are saying that you lost the cipher carelessly.
04:14 On the other hand you are saying that you kept the cipher.
04:17 And on the other hand you are saying that you shared the cipher with the enemy country against national interest.
04:24 So all these three things were very self-contradictory in the charge.
04:28 And these judges gave us a great opportunity, they also gave it to the government.
04:33 So even a two-year case could not be made in any way today.
04:37 And let me tell you about negligence.
04:39 Negligence in Pakistan, maybe someone has ever been punished in Pakistan.
04:44 This is for doctors and that too gross negligence, extreme negligence.
04:49 So the concept of negligence comes from the duty of care.
04:54 So the one who was on duty was Azam Khan.
04:56 When you made Azam Khan a witness, you ruined more than half of your case there.
05:04 And when that witness came to court and there was no pressure on him,
05:08 that witness did not support the government in the false case.
05:12 So you are saying that in the context of mishandling,
05:15 not only would Azam Khan be investigated and punished for the mishandling,
05:23 but he would also be a witness whose statement was less serious.
05:29 But sir, if you allow me, disclosure to unauthorized person,
05:34 which I told you, you better understand, there were three parts of the charge.
05:38 This was also an admitted fact. He would also be punished for two years.
05:41 How did you wriggle this out from here?
05:43 See, the allegation in this that in a political gathering,
05:48 the contents were manipulated, twisted, distorted and kept in front of the public,
05:54 the contents were something else.
05:55 Now I will tell you a very basic principle of military or criminal law.
06:00 On one hand, you are saying that you have shared this document with the public
06:07 and told them everything, gave them this information which should not have been known.
06:12 And on the other hand, you told the Supreme Court judges and the High Court judges
06:16 that we cannot show you this document.
06:19 So this was quite offensive.
06:22 The judges said that there is no such evidence and testimony in the law
06:28 that the judges cannot see.
06:30 So why didn't you bring the cipher to the public?
06:32 There was only one reason for that.
06:34 The cipher would have come on Manzareh-e-Aam, the contents of the cipher would have come out.
06:38 If the judges could read the cipher, then whoever would have read it,
06:41 would have supported Imran Khan's opinion that they have to take the public in confidence.
06:47 And the speech, I want them to run it in their program,
06:51 that in that speech, what did they read out to him or what did they tell him.
06:56 There is absolutely nothing in that speech.
06:59 No confidential information was shared, which was against national interest
07:05 and benefited the foreign power.
07:07 These two words are my focus.
07:09 I have already said benefit to foreign power.
07:12 We don't have any direct or indirect information.
07:14 So the 10-year sentence has been served here.
07:17 I have two complaints, Barrister.
07:21 One is unlawful retention, which was unlawful retention,
07:24 I had that money and negligent handling.
07:27 Negligent handling has also happened,
07:29 though your point is that it should be asked to Azam Khan, he had to handle it.
07:32 The second disclosure to unauthorized person.
07:35 How did I come out of this?
07:36 This wave in a speech.
07:38 I came out of this like this,
07:40 that when SPM handovers a confidential document,
07:45 and there is handing over and taking over,
07:47 then it is written properly that I have given it to you.
07:51 This is in the Secretariat instructions.
07:55 So the judges kept asking that document.

Recommended