‘What Are Your Next Steps To Address Lead In Aviation Fuel?’: Nanette Barragán Asks EPA Admin
During a House Energy & Commerce Committee hearing earlier this month, Rep. Nanette Barragán (D-CA) spoke to EPA Administrator Michael Regan about lead in aircraft emissions, the benefits of the Inflation Reduction Act and other regulations.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00 Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Administrator Regan, I want to thank you for your tireless work
00:06 to strengthen our air and our water protections and invest in environmental justice communities.
00:12 It was great to have you in my district last month to announce EPA's Clean Porch Program,
00:17 which I was proud to secure funding for in the Inflation Reduction Act the Democrats
00:21 fought to pass. And I'm sorry you have to deal with questions about pages and things
00:29 of that nature, because if I sat here and asked a member of Congress how many pages
00:32 one of their bills was, they probably wouldn't know the answer to it. Or if I asked the member
00:37 of Congress the meetings they took six months ago and with whom and where, I would probably
00:42 have to get back to my staff. So I apologize you have to get gotcha questions and instead
00:49 focus on the work that you're doing for the American people, which is so critical. And
00:54 one of those is EPA and lead in aircrafts that I want to ask you about. Last fall, the
01:01 EPA issued an endangerment finding that lead emissions from aircraft are harmful to public
01:08 health. The science is clear. There is no safe blood level of lead. And exposure to
01:14 lead can have permanent detrimental health impacts on children. My constituents live
01:21 near Long Beach Airport suffer from this lead pollution where planes emit almost 1600 pounds
01:28 of lead each year into neighborhoods. Now that the endangerment finding has been finalized,
01:34 EPA is obligated to propose regulations for lead emissions from aircraft that use leaded
01:40 fuel. Can you tell us where the EPA is in the process? And what are your next steps
01:45 to address leaded aviation fuel? Well, thank you for that question. And thank you for your
01:50 leadership. Yes, because we have issued an endangerment finding, the Clean Air Act directs
01:57 EPA to propose and promulgate standards. So our subsequent regulatory action will be done
02:03 in concert with FAA. We're going to be working together to carefully consider the technology,
02:08 the cost, the lead time, the safety. We are well on our way having those conversations.
02:14 And we're working on regulatory options that address these potentially harmful emissions.
02:20 And we're going to keep doing that in partnership. Great. Well, when a rulemaking process is
02:26 launched, I would respectfully ask the EPA to hold a public hearing in Long Beach, California.
02:34 So my constituents can have an opportunity to give public comment and certainly would
02:38 love that engagement. Great. Mr. Administrator, moving on to my next question, the Inflation
02:43 Reduction Act included $3 billion for the Environmental and Climate Justice Grant Program.
02:49 Based off of my bill, the Climate Justice Grants Act, how have the initial grants from
02:54 this program benefited environmental justice communities? And is EPA on track to award
03:00 the remaining $2 billion in community change grants by the end of this year? Well, thank
03:05 you for that. And yes, we are on track. As of last November, we launched our new community
03:11 change grants program, which will invest $2 billion in activities that benefit disadvantaged
03:16 communities. As you know, many of these communities have had solutions for decades. They just
03:21 haven't had a seat at the table. This is a significant opportunity to do that. In December
03:26 of 2023, we announced $600 million for 11 selected grant makers under the Environmental
03:32 Justice Thriving Communities Grant Program. So we're ensuring that we're soliciting
03:36 partnership with those who have been on the ground, who understand where these investments
03:40 should go, and we're very confident that we're on track doing that.
03:43 Great, thank you. There are eight adopted California climate and clean air rules waiting
03:48 on federal waivers from EPA. These rules include zero emission standards for tugboats, locomotives,
03:54 and trucks. I know you've heard me already ask you privately, so publicly, will EPA prioritize
04:00 the review of these waivers? We absolutely will. We have. We've been working
04:05 with CARB. They are eight waivers. They are very ambitious waivers, and so we want to
04:10 give the correct technical evaluation to them. So we've been having those conversations,
04:15 and we've begun to prioritize those eight waivers in response to how California is also
04:21 advising the priority of those eight waivers. Great, thank you. If EPA were to approve all
04:26 these waivers, nearly 9,000 lives could be saved, and California would see over $75 billion
04:31 in public health benefits. This also has national implications, since other states can opt into
04:36 California standards. So I just urge EPA to make these waivers a priority.
04:41 For my next and last question, for the President's proposed fiscal year 2025 budget, there is
04:46 a significant requested increase for EPA's civil rights program, which enforces compliance
04:53 with civil rights laws to address environmental injustice in communities. Can you provide
04:57 greater detail on how EPA plans to use these additional funds to address environmental
05:01 and public health disparities? Absolutely. We are responding to an unprecedented
05:06 volume of civil rights complaints filed with the agency. These resources will represent
05:12 about a $20 million increase, and that will help us advance this very important work.
05:18 It'll help us to not only give a close review of these complaints, but also engage with
05:25 those who have filed these petitions in a timely manner, and provide a level of transparency
05:30 on that civil rights program. So that request is in, is sorely needed, and we look forward
05:37 to the partnership in receiving those funds. Great, thank you. I yield back.