"Kisi par ilzam lagane se kaam nahi chalega...," Faisal Vawda speaks up on Justice Sattar's letter
"Kisi par ilzam lagane se kaam nahi chalega...," Faisal Vawda speaks up on Justice Sattar's letter
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00 a press release from Islamabad High Court.
00:05 I had demanded a lot of things from them before 28th.
00:09 They have answered my request.
00:11 In that reply, there were three lines.
00:15 Prior to Justice Attar's elevation as a judge of the Islamabad High Court,
00:21 he had reported to the Chief Justice of Islamabad High Court
00:25 that he was a Pakistani national
00:28 and had a green card that allowed him to travel to US without a visa.
00:34 Okay, the reply has been received.
00:36 On 34th, 2024, I wrote a letter to the judges of Islamabad High Court
00:47 and received their stamping register.
00:53 After that, I filed a TCS which was received.
00:58 Today, it has been 15 days.
01:02 In the 15 days, the activity that we saw,
01:06 on the day of the holiday, a press release was received.
01:08 It is a good thing. I had demanded and requested before that.
01:12 After that, we saw him writing letters, yesterday and the day before.
01:17 But his reply is not coming.
01:19 Now, this reply is increasing the confusion.
01:23 It is not taking the name of ending the controversy.
01:26 It is a very simple thing.
01:28 He says that prior to becoming a judge,
01:34 Babur Sattar had reported to the Chief Justice of that time, Athar Milena.
01:51 Now, we asked him if there is any legal record of this in the writing that he has given this.
02:00 We are not getting his reply.
02:02 But, under Article 19, I think under Article 19(a),
02:06 Chief Justice of Pakistan, Qazi Faiz Isa Sahib,
02:11 has issued an order that under Article 19(a),
02:14 every Pakistani can ask this question to anyone.
02:18 So, I am a Pakistani,
02:20 a legislator is not getting a senator,
02:23 what will a common Pakistani get?
02:25 I am a common Pakistani, a citizen, and still I am asking for an answer.
02:28 So, now the confusion is increasing.
02:30 People are getting the answer to what is the logic behind this.
02:34 Now, you see the next stage of this.
02:38 One year ago, some things happened.
02:42 One year later, you remember.
02:44 Ok, you remember.
02:46 Now, after remembering,
02:48 why didn't you tell us a year ago?
02:52 Then you were intervened again.
02:55 Yesterday, the day after tomorrow.
02:57 So, the problem is that
03:00 now it won't work to put allegations on anyone.
03:03 Now, you will have to give evidence in a scale of evidence
03:08 that who intervened, who intervened,
03:11 and that the evidence is here, we are with you.
03:13 Otherwise, I will also pick up the phone and say that
03:15 a judge has told me to kill someone,
03:18 so in Article 302, there will be no trial of this person.
03:21 There is nothing in the language.
03:24 Then, if you go further,
03:28 under Code of Conduct 2,
03:33 under Article 2,
03:35 it says about judges that
03:39 they should be afraid of Allah,
03:41 they should have a good tongue,
03:44 they should not be greedy,
03:47 they should be cautious,
03:50 and they should be blameless.
03:52 That is, it should not have any relation to the allegations,
03:57 any discussion on justice and the legal seat.
04:02 So now, the question is that there is no answer.
04:06 Now we are increasing doubts.
04:08 We should be told that is it written in the record?
04:12 Because everything that is told to you,
04:14 to me, in income tax, in courts,
04:17 that is evidence, records, papers, papers.
04:21 No work is done till the paperwork is done.
04:24 No work is finished till the paperwork is done.
04:27 Any work is finished until the paperwork is completed.
04:30 According to that, under this conduct,
04:33 if it is a part of the record, then we should be given.
04:36 As Babar Sattar Sahib wrote to the then Chief Justice,
04:39 Athar Minna Sahib,
04:40 and if it is not,
04:42 my opinion is that it will not be like that,
04:44 but if it is not a part of the record,
04:47 then there are repercussions,
04:49 then there is a worry,
04:50 then there are big question marks.
04:52 Let's move forward.
04:54 Athar Minna Sahib, Justice,
04:56 you know that he makes historical decisions.
04:59 History will always remember him.
05:01 And I have never appeared before him,
05:03 but my case was filed.
05:05 I realized and I also had a conviction that
05:09 Justice Minna Sahib is a very strict,
05:13 principled person.
05:15 My conviction is that Justice Minna Sahib,
05:18 in the case of my case,
05:20 there were papers, there were not,
05:23 it was late morning, there was a trial,
05:25 there was not,
05:26 but he is a principled and strict person.
05:28 Legally, he does not allow any stupidity,
05:31 stupidity or anything,
05:33 he does not allow it.
05:34 We got punished twice.
05:36 The one who did not do it also got punished,
05:38 and twice also got punished.
05:39 This shows that,
05:40 Athar Minna Sahib,
05:41 my conviction is that he is not that judge
05:44 who principally allows anything to be covered.
05:50 Justice Minna Sahib,
05:52 my conviction is that he is not that judge
05:55 who makes decisions for the sake of
05:57 the media to become a symbol of the righteous.
06:00 My conviction is that
06:02 Justice Minna Sahib is not a coward.
06:07 My conviction is that
06:08 Justice Minna Sahib does not come under
06:11 any kind of pressure.
06:14 My conviction is that
06:15 Justice Minna Sahib does not meet anyone
06:17 in the darkness of the night.
06:19 My conviction is that
06:20 Justice Minna Sahib has no connection
06:23 with any old special.
06:25 My conviction is that
06:26 Chief Justice Athar Minna Sahib
06:29 does not meet any political party's messenger.
06:34 My conviction is that
06:35 Athar Minna Sahib does not meet any party's leader
06:39 and does not have any legal, political,
06:42 or official position.
06:44 My conviction is that
06:45 Athar Minna Sahib does not play on the gallery.
06:50 Athar Minna Sahib cannot make a mistake
06:55 in which he has not taken in writing.
06:57 And may Allah make it so that
06:59 he has taken it in writing
07:00 and this thing is present in the record room.
07:03 But if he has not,
07:05 then where Babar Sattar Sahib has a question
07:09 that how is this record?
07:10 Because he was not a judge at that time.
07:12 Prior.
07:13 When he was not a judge,
07:14 he told before becoming a judge.
07:17 So that record and the code of conduct
07:21 under which a person should be blameless,
07:25 under that,
07:26 it is very important for us to present that record.
07:28 Fifteen days have passed.
07:31 How to ask?
07:32 Why not ask?
07:35 Is there anyone in Pakistan
07:36 greater than Pakistan?
07:38 Pakistan is not anyone's father.
07:41 What will be for you,
07:42 will be for me.
07:43 What will be for me,
07:44 will be for them.
07:45 What will be for them,