‘It’s Just Disingenuous’: Kevin Hern Lays Into Sec. Janet Yellen Over Biden Admin’s Tax Promises

  • 5 months ago
During a House Ways & Means Committee hearing last week, Rep. Kevin Hern (R-OK) questioned Treasury Sec. Janet Yellen about tax policies around the world and in the US.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Madam Secretary, thank you for being here today.
00:04Mr. Chairman, I'd like to enter for the record an article from Tax Notes titled
00:08Gain and Little Pain from New Bermuda Corporate Tax.
00:11Without objection.
00:12Thank you.
00:14Madam Secretary, as you might be aware,
00:16Bermuda is introducing its new corporate income tax that will take effect in 2025.
00:21Bermuda entities will be able to mark up their intangible assets to their estimated market value,
00:26and under the new law, they can amortize those assets over 10 years for tax purposes.
00:31Madam Secretary, this creation of a new deferred tax asset also results in a deferred tax expense.
00:38As you know, under general guidelines provided by the OECD for Pillar 2 that you negotiated,
00:43deferred tax expense or these amortized deductions will not trigger minimum tax liability
00:48that could be imposed by other globe-participating countries.
00:52Bermuda has no intention of giving up its ability to attract business through the tax code.
00:57Other countries are adopting similar measures to maintain their status as an attractive jurisdiction
01:03at the expense of United States multinationals.
01:05We know about Singapore, we know about Ireland,
01:07the things they're doing to maintain their ability to use their tax code to lure companies there.
01:13Madam Secretary, are you concerned about the fact that Pillar 2 is creating a new tax subsidy race
01:19where countries enact Pillar 2 taxes but offset the higher tax costs with tax subsidies
01:24in the form of qualified refundable tax credits and other incentives like what Bermuda is doing?
01:32Well, the idea of Pillar 2 is to level the playing field,
01:37and countries that refuse to raise their corporate tax rate up to the minimum,
01:47countries that participate and enact the minimum can in effect tax companies in tax havens that haven't done it.
01:59You cited an example. I'm not aware that this is something that's broad-based,
02:07but if it is, it would certainly concern me, and it's something that I'd be prepared to look into.
02:14Madam Secretary, we've all seen what Ireland has said about putting a cap on recurring revenues.
02:18We've seen what Singapore has said in refundable tax credits.
02:21We've seen what China does in direct tax payments or direct cash payments to their companies
02:26to be able to offset the taxable income so that they, in effect, from the look at it,
02:33that the minimum tax level would be hit, but companies in those countries are getting subsidies
02:38through direct credits that offset that, take it backwards, where ours aren't direct.
02:42Ours are not refundable. We have to actually earn income to be able to utilize those.
02:47Question two, is this administration concerned that Pillar 2 incentivizes subsidy warfare
02:54that puts our adversaries like China at a competitive advantage?
02:58It would concern me if it's incented that, but I'm not aware that that is broad-based at this point,
03:06and in our case, many of our tax credits, such as the green tax credits, the LIHTC credit,
03:14are being treated as refundable.
03:17As I've emphasized previously, we're working to make sure that the R&D tax credit
03:23also will be something that firms can benefit from.
03:26Madam Secretary, I think you just validated that countries have the ability to make certain credits refundable
03:31to offset the minimum tax that other countries or OECD can claim, lie claim to.
03:37China can do it. I think your going there evidenced the fact that they're not always transparent
03:45in what they do, since all of their companies are basically owned by the CCP.
03:50Madam Secretary, I just want to talk about, I've got a longer question here,
03:55but it pertains to the same thing. I think there's a lot of work to be done.
03:59As you know, the committee, the Republicans on the committee, went to the OECD and expressed our concern
04:04and made it very clear that Pillar 2 is not going to take place under a Republican-led Ways and Means committee.
04:11We're not going to give away our tax dollars.
04:13In fact, it's said time and time again about how much tax dollars, how many tax dollars,
04:18the U.S. taxpayer dollars would go around the world, upwards of $200 billion.
04:22I know you said that was JCT's outward look, but I think it's important for everyone to know,
04:27and you know this to be certain, corporations don't pay taxes.
04:31The people that work for the corporations, the consumers of the products of those corporations,
04:36and the owners of those corporations pay the taxes to increase pricing for whatever the commodities are.
04:42In fact, Forbes, Brookings, Tax Foundation, Cato, and many, many others,
04:46have said that consumers pay 31% of the new taxes, workers pay 38% of the taxes.
04:51All of those people, for the most part, make less than $400,000 a year.
04:55So about 70% of the tax increase will be paid by people making less than $400,000 a year, some portion of that.
05:02So I think it's disingenuous, as my colleague from Pennsylvania said,
05:05to say that no one is going to pay a single cent, as outlined in the White House's conversation about policy going forward.
05:12It's just disingenuous. It's not factual, and it's not honest with the American people.
05:17One other thing that you said was that the labor participation rate was better today than it was pre-COVID.
05:23I know you selectively picked an area.
05:27For adults.
05:28It was 63.3% on March 2020, today it's 62.7%.
05:34Overall workforce, you don't have the luxury as an employer, as I did for 35 years,
05:38to say I'm only going to hire people, you've got to be 25 years old or 54 years old.
05:43We have an aging population, and as people retire,
05:47we know that labor force participation overall will decline over time.
05:53Mr. Chair, you're back.
05:55Thank you.

Recommended