Kya Tehreek Insaaf Ko Saddar Pakistan Par Aetmad Nahi Raha?? Janiye Senior Wakel PTI Hamid Khan Se
Kya Tehreek Insaaf Ko Saddar Pakistan Par Aetmad Nahi Raha?? Janiye Senior Wakel PTI Hamid Khan Se
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00 As a lawyer, please give your advice on this.
00:03 The people I have mentioned and others,
00:06 they will not be able to participate in the elections.
00:08 This is a final decision.
00:10 But this is not a sign of change.
00:12 There is a legal point on this.
00:15 Please give your legal opinion on this.
00:17 Ethically, whoever wins,
00:20 they should be morally bound by the discipline of PTI.
00:24 But legally, it will be easier to manage them
00:27 because they will not be legally bound by the discipline of PTI.
00:30 Is this right?
00:31 The point is that
00:36 the aim of this is to weaken the justice of Pakistan Terry.
00:40 And to remove the candidates in leadership of Pakistan Terry from the elections.
00:47 The hands behind this are those who want
00:50 the justice of Pakistan Terry to be completely removed from the elections.
00:55 The former MPs of Pakistan Terry are also being removed from the elections.
01:01 So I think that the decisions that have been taken today
01:06 are the only hands behind the plan
01:11 to remove the justice of Pakistan Terry from the elections.
01:16 This is a result of a judicial decision.
01:19 So you think there is a nexus between those people
01:22 who don't want the party to be in the field and the judicial decision?
01:25 Yes, exactly.
01:27 Those people who are bent on taking the part of Pakistan Terry
01:32 in the elections,
01:37 and those people who have a relationship with the leadership of Pakistan Terry,
01:48 and those people who are bent on taking the part of Pakistan Terry in the elections,
01:53 and those people who are bent on taking the part of Pakistan Terry in the elections,
02:00 and all these are the result of the same efforts.
02:03 This is a consistent situation that is coming before you.
02:06 Mr. Amir, you are giving your opinion about the Chief Justice of Pakistan Terry,
02:11 that he has become a part of this thought.
02:15 I am not talking about a single person.
02:19 I am talking about the people who are against the justice of Terry,
02:27 like the Election Commission of Pakistan.
02:30 I think that the decisions that have been taken after that,
02:34 I am not attacking anyone's intentions.
02:37 I am just saying that the decisions that have been taken
02:42 are not right and historically will be proven wrong.
02:46 Like in the past, there are many judicial decisions
02:49 on which people have been protected
02:52 and it has been understood that there was no justice.
02:56 It is possible that in the future,
02:58 this will happen on these decisions as well.
03:02 What is your opinion?
03:03 For those things that you want justice,
03:06 should the request be made in the court of Qazi Faiz Issa Sahib
03:08 or do you think that we have lost trust in him
03:11 and that the PTI should not be presented in front of him?
03:14 Look, it is true to a great extent that
03:18 so many things have been created
03:21 that the trust has not been maintained.
03:27 Okay, so it is possible that you are not in a position
03:31 to present yourself in front of him in any case?
03:34 No, look, we cannot leave the institutions.
03:39 We want to keep the institutions in place.
03:42 That is why we will show a great extent of restraint
03:47 that we do not attack the institutions.
03:51 However, under the law, it is allowed for every citizen,
03:57 every political person,
04:00 it is allowed that they can criticize themselves
04:05 in the appropriate words of any court,
04:10 that is, the High Court or the Supreme Court.
04:14 In the appropriate words, the law has allowed it.
04:19 And they should criticize in the law
04:22 and have the right to criticize.
04:27 This matter is in the senior party leadership.
04:31 The senior party leader, Mr. Sheraz Al Marwat,
04:34 the party translator, Mr. Rohit Fasan,
04:37 says that he is not a party representative,
04:40 he is not the senior party leader,
04:43 he does not know if he meets Mr. Khan
04:46 or if he releases statements from his side.
04:49 Then you also in a way,
04:51 you have clarified his statements.
04:54 What is the reason for this?
04:57 The elections are still 20-25 days away.
05:00 Then there should be no such statements
05:03 so that the party's attention is focused on the elections,
05:06 not on these matters.
05:08 Look, these are the kind of people who are doing it,
05:11 whose duty is to create a division in the party,
05:16 to create a division in the party,
05:19 and so that the establishment can say
05:22 that the party has divided among itself.
05:25 Those who we think are not even the face of the PTI,
05:30 I don't know where they have come from,
05:33 when they try to divide among themselves,
05:37 there are other factors behind it
05:41 that are involved in creating various divisions in the party.
05:46 But sir, the one you are giving this opinion about is no one else,
05:48 but Imran Khan sir,
05:49 he is the party's senior knife,
05:51 has he received a notification about this?
05:55 As far as he has told me,
05:57 he has said that no, I have removed him.
06:01 Because in the Mar-Mar party,
06:04 in the division party,
06:05 in the fight party,
06:07 they have been trying to create differences among themselves,
06:11 that is why Imran Khan sir has told me this.
06:14 You yourself have been told by Imran Khan sir that I have removed him.
06:16 Yes.
06:17 And sir, this, generally speaking,
06:20 when we talk about Pakistan's role,
06:22 do you think that the President of Pakistan has played his role well,
06:27 or has the PTI lost its confidence in the President of Pakistan?
06:31 Look, I don't think that his role is what we expected,
06:38 because in many cases, in very critical times,
06:42 he did not make the decisions that he should have made according to the rules,
06:47 because of which Pakistan's politics has been questioned
06:52 on the compliance of the constitution in Pakistan.
06:56 And that is why I think that there will be a lot of criticism about him in history.
07:03 For example, when he gave the order to dissolve the assembly in August,
07:12 he should have given the date of the general election within 90 days.
07:17 He did not, and he has opened a new chapter,
07:21 and because of that you see that in 90 days,
07:25 the need for the constitution, the order for the constitution,
07:30 was not fully implemented.
07:33 So, in this respect, I think that there are many such cases
07:38 in which he did not play his role fully.
07:43 And do you think that the reason for this is that you sympathize with him,
07:47 that there will be a lot of pressure, so he did the best he could,
07:50 or do you think that his heart has changed?
07:55 Look, I have never met him,
08:00 so I can't say what pressure he was under,
08:03 but one thing is certain, that whatever decisions have been made,
08:09 for example, about 2-3 bills, he said later that I said that they should be returned,
08:16 I am not at all ready to give any assent to them.
08:20 At that time, he should have said in writing that,
08:24 taking the wrong advantage of it,
08:27 two such laws have been made, which have been considered to be law,
08:33 although I don't think that their laws are made by the act of the parliament,
08:38 the amendments in the Official Secrets Act and the amendments in the Army Act,
08:44 both of them without the assent of the president,
08:47 they can never be made into law,
08:49 and in my opinion, those laws have not been made yet.
08:52 But there was some weakness in that too,
08:56 at that time, he should have sent them in writing,
08:59 he instead told his subordinate to return them,
09:03 he said it verbally,
09:05 and he was displeased with what he said,
09:08 and he said that he had not said it.
09:10 What was the result?
09:12 The result was that two wrong kinds of laws,
09:15 which were not really made,
09:18 were considered to be law,
09:21 and they were made a part of the statute book,
09:23 under which cases are being run,
09:26 under which people have the right to appeal,
09:29 and under which even military courts will be given an appeal,
09:33 this is a huge loss.
09:35 If at that time, he would have rejected them in writing,
09:41 and sent them back to bring them in joint session,
09:45 then this matter would have been over.
09:47 Even then, I believe that those laws were not made,
09:51 the Act of Parliament was not made.
09:53 Thank you very much, sir.