Al-Azizia case: Is Nawaz Sharif likely to get relief? - Law Experts' Analysis

Name: Al-Azizia case: Is Nawaz Sharif likely to get relief? - Law Experts' Analysis
Uploaded: 2023-12-07T19:25:49+00:00
Duration: 7 min 23 s
Channel: ARY NEWS

ARY NEWS

12/7/2023

#11thHour #NawazSharif #IslamabadHighCourt #AlAziziaReference

Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY

Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP

ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.

Official Facebook: https://www.fb.com/arynewsasia

Official Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/arynewsofficial

Official Instagram: https://instagram.com/arynewstv

Website: https://arynews.tv

Watch ARY NEWS LIVE: http://live.arynews.tv

Listen Live: http://live.arynews.tv/audio

Listen Top of the hour Headlines, Bulletins & Programs: https://soundcloud.com/arynewsofficial
#ARYNews

ARY News Official YouTube Channel.
For more videos, subscribe to our channel and for suggestions please use the comment section.

Category

🗞

News

Transcript

Display full video transcript

00:00 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

00:01 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

00:02 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

00:03 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

00:05 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

00:06 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

00:07 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

00:08 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

00:09 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

00:31 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

00:32 Starting from you, [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

00:48 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

00:49 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:10 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:11 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:12 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:13 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:14 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:15 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:16 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:18 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:19 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:20 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:21 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:22 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:23 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:24 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:25 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:26 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:27 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:28 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:29 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:30 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:31 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:32 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:33 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:34 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:35 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:36 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:37 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:38 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:39 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:40 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:41 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:42 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:43 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:44 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:50 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:53 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:55 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

01:58 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

02:01 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

02:04 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

02:07 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

02:10 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

02:13 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

02:16 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

02:19 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

02:22 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

02:25 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

02:28 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

02:31 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

02:34 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

02:37 [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

02:40 but on the other hand, there's evidence in such cases, because they have to show that the court did not appreciate the evidence, and gave a wrong decision.

02:50 so of course, the evidence will be presented before the court, and how much evidence I've seen, so it may take time, it may take time when the court says that we concede,

03:01 it may be that they do not argue the case, so it may not take time.

03:07 but what can be the consequences of such decisions, I'm not asking you to predict the decision, I'm asking you to decide what can be the consequences of such decisions.

03:13 either the conviction will be set aside, they will be acquitted of the accusation, or they will be upholded the judgement, and they will say that the decision was right, and we uphold the decision.

03:29 in that case, they will have a forum of the Supreme Court, and they will appeal.

03:31 so these are the two possibilities, in a rare possibility, it may be that they will be sent to the lower court again.

03:41 it may be, the court may reach the conclusion that there were some shortcomings, and they will send them to the court, but the method of sending them will be that they will set aside the judgement,

03:51 they will set aside and demand that you listen to it again, or they may say that more evidence should be taken in this case, whatever it may be.

03:58 so you are saying that you will not be surprised if this case is closed in the next few hearings.

04:03 yes, it depends on how much time the court takes, what questions the court asks, there will be issues in front of the court,

04:10 they will have to show that they have not discharged their burden of prosecution, the trial court has not appreciated the evidence properly, because of which the judgement will be set aside.

04:20 Mr. Irfan, if you could tell us quickly, how long do you think it will take?

04:24 secondly, the Noon League has made a lot of things public, and I think it should have been made public,

04:29 there was a lot of development, that there was a video of the sitting judge, in which he said that I was under pressure, that's why I did this.

04:36 today when they had this opportunity, they said that the judge is no longer in this world, so we don't want to take this case any further.

04:42 was it a good move? or should they have set an example that the judge is no longer in this world, may Allah have mercy on him.

04:48 but if this case would have been held, then we would have known that yes, the statements that they had, that the punishment was not given, it was made, so is this right or wrong?

04:56 it was an ideal opportunity to prove this on a legal forum, because it is not proven by a speech in a convention.

05:00 so do you think this was a legal move or that we should not take this case any further, and finish the case, leave it.

05:06 who said that we don't want to take this case any further? there is no clarity in your question.

05:11 sir, today's hearing, you must have followed today's hearing, so you must have seen the impact.

05:18 no, you have asked a question, you are saying that someone has said that we don't want to take this case any further, who said that we don't want to take this case any further?

05:26 sir, today's hearing, when the judge was doing the wedding of the great Nadeem Tadar and the judge advocate Nawaz Sharif, when the judge gave them an enough opportunity,

05:33 he asked them whether they want to take the case of Arshad Malik further or not, and they said that they don't want to take it any further.

05:40 the judge is not in this world.

05:42 no, I think that in their mind, they would have thought that we should talk about the merits of this case, or the law points,

05:51 because he is not in this world, so that point is one of the many points,

05:57 so they thought that when the case is subject to a trial, they will answer this.

06:04 and as far as you were saying, you were answering the question first, and Abid Zubairi was also answering,

06:10 I had some impression that there has been some change in the court, so I just want to tell you that this case of Al Aziziyah,

06:18 all these cases, the court did not investigate them, and it is necessary to investigate the court under the law,

06:24 and then this case was not made by the court, it was supervised by the Supreme Court,

06:29 and JIT was also made by the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court issued the orders to make reference in this case,

06:36 so on the face of it, there were mistakes in this case, and I agree with Abid Zubairi that this case is definitely going towards acquittal,

06:45 because if they wanted to remand, they could have done it today as well, but since they are not remanding,

06:51 so when this case will be decided on marriage, this is a foregone conclusion,

06:56 because when the decision of the trial was issued, I said at that time that the decision is wrong from a logical, legal and factual point of view,

07:05 and then this was proven in the case of Maryam Nawaz, and after that they have been acquitted in the case of Evanfield,

07:11 so this is absolutely clear, I am also of the same view as Abid Zubairi,

07:20 the quidal.