Tech Leaders Support Regulating AI in Closed-Door Meeting
- 7 months ago
Tech Leaders , Support Regulating AI , in Closed-Door Meeting.
On September 13, leaders in the tech industry endorsed
the government regulating artificial intelligence during
a closed-door meeting at the U.S. Senate.
On September 13, leaders in the tech industry endorsed
the government regulating artificial intelligence during
a closed-door meeting at the U.S. Senate.
The private forum on Capitol Hill was organized
by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer as part
of a push to legislate artificial intelligence.
The private forum on Capitol Hill was organized
by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer as part
of a push to legislate artificial intelligence.
Associated Press reports that there is little consensus
regarding what form that regulation would take,
and potential legislation would be difficult.
AP reports that ideas presented in the meeting
included the creation of an independent agency to oversee
AI and how the U.S. can stay ahead of other countries. .
According to Schumer, the goal is to maximize
the benefits of AI while also minimizing the risks.
Whether that’s enshrining bias,
or the loss of jobs, or even the
kind of doomsday scenarios that
were mentioned in the room.
And only government can
be there to put in guardrails, Chuck Schumer, Senate Majority Leader, via Associated Press.
Meta's Mark Zuckerberg, Google's Sundar Pichai,
Bill Gates and Elon Musk were reportedly
among the attendees at the meeting.
Meta's Mark Zuckerberg, Google's Sundar Pichai,
Bill Gates and Elon Musk were reportedly
among the attendees at the meeting.
Meta's Mark Zuckerberg, Google's Sundar Pichai,
Bill Gates and Elon Musk were reportedly
among the attendees at the meeting.
The key point was really
that it’s important for
us to have a referee, Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and X, via Associated Press.
It was a very civilized discussion,
actually, among some of the
smartest people in the world, Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and X, via Associated Press.
AP reports that some lawmakers were critical
of the meeting being closed-door, arguing that
the discussion should be more transparent
On September 13, leaders in the tech industry endorsed
the government regulating artificial intelligence during
a closed-door meeting at the U.S. Senate.
On September 13, leaders in the tech industry endorsed
the government regulating artificial intelligence during
a closed-door meeting at the U.S. Senate.
The private forum on Capitol Hill was organized
by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer as part
of a push to legislate artificial intelligence.
The private forum on Capitol Hill was organized
by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer as part
of a push to legislate artificial intelligence.
Associated Press reports that there is little consensus
regarding what form that regulation would take,
and potential legislation would be difficult.
AP reports that ideas presented in the meeting
included the creation of an independent agency to oversee
AI and how the U.S. can stay ahead of other countries. .
According to Schumer, the goal is to maximize
the benefits of AI while also minimizing the risks.
Whether that’s enshrining bias,
or the loss of jobs, or even the
kind of doomsday scenarios that
were mentioned in the room.
And only government can
be there to put in guardrails, Chuck Schumer, Senate Majority Leader, via Associated Press.
Meta's Mark Zuckerberg, Google's Sundar Pichai,
Bill Gates and Elon Musk were reportedly
among the attendees at the meeting.
Meta's Mark Zuckerberg, Google's Sundar Pichai,
Bill Gates and Elon Musk were reportedly
among the attendees at the meeting.
Meta's Mark Zuckerberg, Google's Sundar Pichai,
Bill Gates and Elon Musk were reportedly
among the attendees at the meeting.
The key point was really
that it’s important for
us to have a referee, Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and X, via Associated Press.
It was a very civilized discussion,
actually, among some of the
smartest people in the world, Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and X, via Associated Press.
AP reports that some lawmakers were critical
of the meeting being closed-door, arguing that
the discussion should be more transparent