Experts Call for Pause in Development of Advanced AI Systems
  • last year
Experts Call for Pause , in Development of , Advanced AI Systems.
'The Guardian' reports that over 1,000 artificial
intelligence experts have issued a call for
a temporary halt to developing AI. .
The experts, which include Elon Musk, think the
halt should last for at least six months so that the dangers of systems like GPT-4 can be studied and mitigated.
The experts, which include Elon Musk, think the
halt should last for at least six months so that the dangers of systems like GPT-4 can be studied and mitigated.
Musk co-founded OpenAI, the research lab
responsible for the creation of ChatGPT
and its latest iteration, GPT-4. .
Other AI experts to sign the demand include
Emad Mostaque, who founded London-based Stability AI, and Steve Wozniak, the co-founder of Apple.
Other AI experts to sign the demand include
Emad Mostaque, who founded London-based Stability AI, and Steve Wozniak, the co-founder of Apple.
Signatories also include engineers working at
DeepMind, Microsoft, Meta, Google and Amazon.
Signatories also include engineers working at
DeepMind, Microsoft, Meta, Google and Amazon.
The letter was coordinated by
thinktank Future of Life Institute.
Recent months have seen AI labs locked
in an out-of-control race to develop and
deploy ever more powerful digital minds
that no one – not even their creators –
can understand, predict, or reliably control. , Future of Life Institute letter, via 'The Guardian'.
Powerful AI systems should be
developed only once we are confident
that their effects will be positive
and their risks will be manageable, Future of Life Institute letter, via 'The Guardian'.
The authors cite OpenAI's co-founder, , Sam Altman, who wrote in February, .
“At some point, it may be important to get independent review before starting to train future systems, and for the most advanced efforts to agree to limit the rate of growth of compute used for creating new models.”.
The authors of the Future of Life Institute
letter wrote in response to Altman, , “We agree. That point is now.”
Recommended