Prime Minister Erdogan’s meeting with Putin about Syria delivered results. Putin is abstaining from radicals lacking quality

  • 9 yıl önce
- After Putin and Erdoğan’s meeting in Turkey, there has been a significant change in the tone of the Russian authorities. The Parliamentary Floor Leader of the United Russian Party, which is currently in power, said for the first time that the Syrian administration is unable to discharge its duties properly. Putin, on the other hand, said, “We neither back the Syrian regime, nor their advocates. We still have concerns about the future of Syria. I am leaving here with new and fresh ideas.”

ADNAN OKTAR: God has shown us that what I am saying is true. I said, “Putin is a sensible person. He is reasonable and conscientious. There is no need to contact with anyone else, those attempts with Syria would deliver no results. There is nothing that Assad can do anyway. The talks should be held directly with Putin himself, the matter will then be settled.”  As is always the case, what I said came out to be true, many thanks to God. They [the Turkish government] have seen that talking to Putin is a method that would solve the problem once and for all. If these meetings are improved even further, if they become more inclusive and if all aspects of the issue are considered, very good results can be obtained. Putin is right in many ways. First off he says that he abstains from radicals and he is right to feel so. Once they come to power, they do not leave behind anything to define quality; they devastate everything good and beautiful. Because they assume that aesthetics, quality and beauty are against Islam, they ruin them. Because they consider oppression, violence, fear and bigotry as piousness, they adopt it albeit unwillingly; even though they, themselves, do not want it either. For instance, in Egypt the government came to power but people are not pleased with it. I think they are also not pleased themselves. The opposition is also not pleased. Neither the wishes of the opposition nor their own wishes are fulfilled. Yet the trouble there is lack of quality. If quality were established, liberals and secular folks would have never made such a scene. There is a quality disorder, there is a lack of quality; the quality of their life has been diminished. For them life has become crude. There is no joy, no fun, no aesthetics, no arts, no improvement in science. So people have become exasperated.